Thesis/CLAUDE.md
2026-02-06 20:23:52 -05:00

134 lines
5.5 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

# CLAUDE.md
This file provides guidance to Claude Code (claude.ai/code) when working with code in this repository.
## Project Overview
This is a PhD thesis proposal for developing a methodology to build High-Assurance Hybrid Autonomous Control Systems (HAHACS) for critical infrastructure. The proposal is titled "From Cold Start to Critical: Formal Synthesis of Autonomous Hybrid Controllers."
**Intellectual Merit**: The contribution is architectural unification rather than algorithmic novelty. The methodology provides a systematic decomposition mapping verification techniques to control mode types, composing existing formal methods into a complete framework where none existed.
**Key Insight**: The methodology formalizes EXISTING discrete abstractions from operating procedures (especially nuclear) rather than imposing arbitrary ones. Operating procedures already define go/no-go conditions as discrete predicates - this work provides the formalization and verification framework.
## Document Structure
The proposal uses a modular LaTeX structure with numbered section directories:
- `main.tex` - Root document that inputs all sections
- `1-goals-and-outcomes/` - Research statement and goals
- `2-state-of-the-art/` - Literature review
- `3-research-approach/` - Core methodology (CURRENTLY ACTIVE WORK)
- `4-metrics-of-success/` - Success criteria
- `5-risks-and-contingencies/` - Risk analysis
- `6-broader-impacts/` - Broader impacts
- `8-schedule/` - Timeline
Each section directory contains:
- `v1.tex` (or `v2.tex` for actively revised sections) - Main content
- `outline.md` (optional) - Planning notes and structure
**IMPORTANT**: Section 3 (research-approach) is currently being revised. `main.tex` inputs `v2.tex` for this section, which contains extensive inline comments and questions prefixed with `%` and `% Q:`.
## Building the Document
```bash
# Full build with bibliography
pdflatex main.tex
bibtex main
pdflatex main.tex
pdflatex main.tex
# Quick build (no bibliography updates)
pdflatex main.tex
# Use latexmk for automated builds
latexmk -pdf main.tex
# Clean auxiliary files
latexmk -c
```
The output is `main.pdf`.
## Key Technical Concepts
### Mathematical Notation
- **Continuous state space**: X ⊆ ℝⁿ
- **Discrete modes**: Q = {q₁, q₂, ...}
- **Per-mode continuous regions**: X_entry,i, X_exit,i, X_safe,i
- **Discrete predicates**: pᵢ: X → {true, false} (Boolean functions over continuous state)
### Three Control Mode Types
Each mode type has distinct control objectives and verification methods:
1. **Transitory modes**: Transition between discrete states
- Objective: reach(X_entry) → reach(X_exit) while maintaining x(t) ∈ X_safe
- Verification: Reachability analysis
- Formal: Reach(X_entry, f(x,u), T) ⊆ X_exit X_safe
2. **Stabilizing modes**: Maintain steady state
- Objective: remain(X_target) where X_target ⊂ X_safe
- Verification: Barrier certificates
- Formal: ∇B(x)·f(x,u) ≤ 0 on boundary ∂X_safe
3. **Expulsory modes**: Safe shutdown under failures
- Objective: reach(X_current) → reach(X_safe_shutdown) under parametric uncertainty
- Verification: Parametric robust reachability
- Formal: Reach(X_current, f(x,u,θ), T) ⊆ X_safe_shutdown for all θ ∈ Θ_failure
### Scope Boundaries
- **Verify** continuous controllers, not **synthesize** them (analogous to model checking)
- Assume controllers can be designed using standard control theory
- Contribution is verification that candidate controllers compose correctly with discrete layer
## Active Development Context
### Current Focus (as of 2026-01-26)
Editing the research approach section (`3-research-approach/v2.tex`) with a Wednesday (2026-01-28) draft deadline.
### Open Technical Questions
Questions are embedded in `v2.tex` comments. Key unresolved issues:
**Easier to address:**
- Hysteresis and sensor noise handling (standard control theory)
- Mealy machine formalization (presentation issue)
- Failure detection scope boundaries (precision in claims)
**More challenging:**
- Timing constraint verification (timed automata integration)
- Parametric uncertainty bounds methodology
- Numerical precision in discrete abstraction (task 36 in taskwarrior)
- Controller design gap (scope vulnerability)
### Taskwarrior Integration
The user tracks tasks in taskwarrior. The Thesis project has ~45 tasks including:
- 9 writing tasks for research approach sections (due 2026-01-28)
- Multiple reading tasks on hybrid systems, reachability, formal methods
- Outstanding question (task 36): "How do we handle numerical barriers when creating discrete automata?"
Use `task list project:Thesis` to see current tasks.
## Bibliography
References are in `references.bib` using IEEE transaction format. The bibliography includes:
- Hybrid systems theory and verification
- Formal methods (reactive synthesis, temporal logic)
- Control theory (reachability, barrier certificates)
- Nuclear regulatory documents (NUREG, 10 CFR)
- Industrial control systems
## Custom LaTeX Class
`dane_proposal_format.cls` provides:
- NSF-compliant formatting (Times New Roman, 1" margins)
- Custom `\task{title}{description}` command for numbered tasks
- TikZ libraries for diagrams
- Table and figure formatting
- Default metadata (title, author, advisor)
## Writing Style Notes
- Inline comments in `.tex` files starting with `%` are working notes
- Comments with `% Q:` indicate open questions requiring research/decisions
- Sections marked with `\iffalse ... \fi` are draft text, not compiled
- Text after `\iffalse` blocks are outlines/notes for future writing