Thesis/1-goals-and-outcomes/research_statement_v1.tex
Split 9448984694 Editorial review: three-pass copy edit (tactical, operational, strategic)
PASS 1 - TACTICAL (sentence-level):
- Converted passive voice to active throughout
- Strengthened weak verbs (fail → cannot, such → empty deletion)
- Improved issue-point positioning for clarity
- Enhanced topic-stress alignment

PASS 2 - OPERATIONAL (paragraph/section):
- Improved transitions between subsections
- Enhanced coherence within sections
- Strengthened flow between paragraphs
- Made section summaries more cohesive

PASS 3 - STRATEGIC (document-level):
- Strengthened Heilmeier question framing throughout
- Improved section-to-section transitions
- Enhanced narrative coherence across document
- Made Heilmeier answers more explicit and consistent
2026-03-09 13:45:28 -04:00

70 lines
3.9 KiB
TeX

% GOAL PARAGRAPH
This research develops autonomous control systems with mathematical guarantees of safe and correct behavior.
% INTRODUCTORY PARAGRAPH Hook
Nuclear reactors require extensively trained operators who follow detailed written procedures. Plant conditions guide operator decisions when they switch between control objectives.
% Gap
Small modular reactors face a fundamental economic challenge: per-megawatt staffing costs significantly exceed those of conventional plants, threatening viability. To remain competitive, these reactors need autonomous control systems that manage complex operational sequences safely without constant supervision while providing assurance equal to or exceeding that of human-operated systems.
% APPROACH PARAGRAPH Solution
We combine formal methods from computer science with control theory to
build hybrid control systems that are correct by construction.
% Rationale
Hybrid systems mirror how operators work: discrete
logic switches between continuous control modes. Existing formal methods
generate provably correct switching logic but cannot handle continuous dynamics
during transitions. Control theory verifies continuous behavior but
cannot prove the correctness of discrete switching decisions.
% Hypothesis and Technical Approach
Our methodology bridges this gap through three stages. First, we translate written
operating procedures into temporal logic specifications using NASA's Formal
Requirements Elicitation Tool (FRET). FRET structures requirements into scope,
condition, component, timing, and response elements. Realizability
checking identifies conflicts and ambiguities before implementation.
Second, reactive synthesis generates deterministic automata that are provably
correct by construction.
Third, we design continuous controllers for each discrete mode using standard
control theory and verify them using reachability analysis. We classify continuous modes by their transition objectives. Assume-guarantee contracts and barrier certificates prove that mode transitions occur safely. This approach enables local verification of continuous modes
without requiring global trajectory analysis across the entire hybrid system. We demonstrate this methodology on an
Emerson Ovation control system.
% Pay-off
This autonomous control approach can then manage complex nuclear
power operations while maintaining safety guarantees, directly addressing the economic constraints threatening small modular reactor viability.
% OUTCOMES PARAGRAPHS
If this research is successful, we will be able to do the following:
\begin{enumerate}
% OUTCOME 1 Title
\item \textit{Synthesize written procedures into verified control logic.}
% Strategy
We will develop a methodology for converting written operating procedures
into formal specifications. Reactive synthesis tools generate
discrete control logic from these specifications.
% Outcome
Control engineers generate mode-switching controllers from regulatory
procedures with minimal formal methods expertise, reducing barriers to
high-assurance control systems.
% OUTCOME 2 Title
\item \textit{Verify continuous control behavior across mode transitions.}
% Strategy
Reachability analysis verifies that continuous control modes satisfy discrete
transition requirements.
% Outcome
Engineers design continuous controllers using standard practices while
maintaining formal correctness guarantees. Mode transitions provably occur safely and at
the correct times.
% OUTCOME 3 Title
\item \textit{Demonstrate autonomous reactor startup control with safety
guarantees.}
% Strategy
A small modular reactor simulation using industry-standard control hardware
implements this methodology.
% Outcome
Control engineers implement high-assurance autonomous controls on
industrial platforms they already use, enabling autonomy without retraining
costs or new equipment development.
\end{enumerate}