Thesis/1-goals-and-outcomes/research_statement_v1.tex
Split 914f821b5c Copy-edit thesis proposal: tactical, operational, strategic passes
Tactical (sentence-level):
- Improved issue-point structure (old info → new info)
- Strengthened verb choice (active voice where appropriate)
- Enhanced topic strings across consecutive sentences
- Reduced subject-verb separation
- Better stress positioning at sentence ends

Operational (paragraph/section):
- Improved transitions between subsections
- Added rhetorical questions to bridge paragraphs
- Enhanced coherence within sections
- Clarified logical flow

Strategic (document-level):
- Reinforced Heilmeier catechism structure
- Made question-answer pairs more explicit
- Improved section-ending summaries
- Strengthened forward links between sections
- Enhanced parallel structure in enumerated lists
2026-03-09 15:18:56 -04:00

54 lines
4.0 KiB
TeX

% GOAL PARAGRAPH
This research develops autonomous control systems with mathematical guarantees of safe and correct behavior.
% INTRODUCTORY PARAGRAPH Hook
Human operators control today's nuclear reactors through extensive training, following detailed written procedures and switching between control objectives based on plant conditions.
% Gap
Small modular reactors face a fundamental economic challenge: per-megawatt staffing costs significantly exceed those of conventional plants, threatening economic viability. Autonomous control systems could manage complex operational sequences without constant supervision—but only if they provide assurance equal to or exceeding that of human-operated systems.
% APPROACH PARAGRAPH Solution
This research combines formal methods from computer science with control theory to produce hybrid control systems that are correct by construction.
% Rationale
Human operators already work this way: discrete logic switches between continuous control modes. Formal methods can generate provably correct switching logic but fail when continuous dynamics govern transitions. Control theory can verify continuous behavior but cannot prove discrete switching correctness. Both approaches must work together to achieve end-to-end correctness.
% Hypothesis and Technical Approach
Three stages bridge this gap. First, NASA's Formal Requirements Elicitation Tool (FRET) translates written operating procedures into temporal logic specifications, structuring requirements by scope, condition, component, timing, and response. Realizability checking then exposes conflicts and ambiguities before implementation begins. Second, reactive synthesis generates deterministic automata that are provably correct by construction. Third, reachability analysis verifies that continuous controllers—designed using standard control theory—satisfy the requirements that each discrete mode imposes.
Continuous modes classify by control objective. Transitory modes drive the plant between conditions. Stabilizing modes maintain operation within regions. Expulsory modes ensure safety under failures. Barrier certificates and assume-guarantee contracts prove safe mode transitions, enabling local verification without global trajectory analysis. The methodology demonstrates on an Emerson Ovation control system.
% Pay-off
This approach manages complex nuclear power operations autonomously while maintaining safety guarantees, directly addressing the economic constraints that threaten small modular reactor viability.
% OUTCOMES PARAGRAPHS
This research, if successful, produces three concrete outcomes:
\begin{enumerate}
% OUTCOME 1 Title
\item \textit{Synthesize written procedures into verified control logic.}
% Strategy
A methodology converts written operating procedures into formal specifications.
Reactive synthesis tools then generate discrete control logic from these specifications.
% Outcome
Control engineers generate mode-switching controllers directly from regulatory
procedures. Minimal formal methods expertise required. This reduces barriers to
high-assurance control systems.
% OUTCOME 2 Title
\item \textit{Verify continuous control behavior across mode transitions.}
% Strategy
Reachability analysis verifies that continuous control modes satisfy discrete
transition requirements.
% Outcome
Engineers design continuous controllers using standard practices while
maintaining formal correctness guarantees. Mode transitions occur safely and at
the correct times—provably.
% OUTCOME 3 Title
\item \textit{Demonstrate autonomous reactor startup control with safety
guarantees.}
% Strategy
This methodology demonstrates on a small modular reactor simulation using industry-standard control hardware.
% Outcome
Control engineers implement high-assurance autonomous controls on
industrial platforms they already use, enabling autonomy without retraining
costs or new equipment development.
\end{enumerate}