Thesis/1-goals-and-outcomes/research_statement_v1.tex

% GOAL PARAGRAPH
This research develops autonomous control systems with mathematical guarantees of safe and correct behavior.

% INTRODUCTORY PARAGRAPH Hook
Extensively trained operators manage nuclear reactors by following detailed written procedures. Plant conditions guide their decisions when they switch between control objectives.
% Gap
Small modular reactors face a fundamental economic challenge: their per-megawatt staffing costs significantly exceed those of conventional plants, threatening viability. Autonomous control systems must manage complex operational sequences safely—without constant supervision—while providing assurance equal to or exceeding that of human-operated systems.

% APPROACH PARAGRAPH Solution
We combine formal methods from computer science with control theory to
build hybrid control systems that are correct by construction. 
% Rationale
Hybrid systems mirror how operators work: discrete
logic switches between continuous control modes. Existing formal methods
generate provably correct switching logic but cannot handle continuous dynamics
during transitions. Control theory verifies continuous behavior but
cannot prove the correctness of discrete switching decisions. 
% Hypothesis and Technical Approach
Our methodology bridges this gap through three stages. First, we translate written
operating procedures into temporal logic specifications using NASA's Formal
Requirements Elicitation Tool (FRET). FRET structures requirements into scope,
condition, component, timing, and response elements. Realizability
checking identifies conflicts and ambiguities before implementation.
Second, reactive synthesis generates deterministic automata that are provably
correct by construction.
Third, we design continuous controllers for each discrete mode using standard
control theory and verify them using reachability analysis. We classify continuous modes by their transition objectives. Assume-guarantee contracts and barrier certificates prove that mode transitions occur safely. Local verification of continuous modes
becomes possible without requiring global trajectory analysis across the entire hybrid system. This methodology is demonstrated on an
Emerson Ovation control system. 
% Pay-off
Autonomous control can then manage complex nuclear
power operations while maintaining safety guarantees, directly addressing the economic constraints threatening small modular reactor viability.

% OUTCOMES PARAGRAPHS
If this research is successful, we will be able to do the following:
\begin{enumerate}
  % OUTCOME 1 Title
  \item \textit{Synthesize written procedures into verified control logic.} 
    % Strategy
    We will develop a methodology for converting written operating procedures
    into formal specifications. Reactive synthesis tools generate
    discrete control logic from these specifications.
    % Outcome
    Control engineers generate mode-switching controllers from regulatory
    procedures with minimal formal methods expertise, reducing barriers to
    high-assurance control systems.

    % OUTCOME 2 Title
  \item \textit{Verify continuous control behavior across mode transitions.}
    % Strategy
    Reachability analysis verifies that continuous control modes satisfy discrete
    transition requirements. 
    % Outcome
    Engineers design continuous controllers using standard practices while
    maintaining formal correctness guarantees. Mode transitions provably occur safely and at
    the correct times.

    % OUTCOME 3  Title
  \item \textit{Demonstrate autonomous reactor startup control with safety
    guarantees.}
    % Strategy
    A small modular reactor simulation using industry-standard control hardware
    implements this methodology.
    % Outcome
    Control engineers implement high-assurance autonomous controls on
    industrial platforms they already use, enabling autonomy without retraining
    costs or new equipment development.

\end{enumerate}