Thesis/1-goals-and-outcomes/research_statement_v1.tex
Split 46a7e63b45 Editorial pass: Three-level copy-editing (tactical/operational/strategic)
Pass 1 (Tactical - sentence level):
- Strengthened verb constructions (fail/lack vs cannot/will not)
- Improved topic-stress positioning
- Reduced weak passive voice
- Removed unnecessary future tense (will → present)
- Enhanced issue-point positioning per Gopen

Pass 2 (Operational - paragraph/section):
- Improved transitions between major sections
- Enhanced coherence within subsections
- Smoothed flow between State of Art → Research Approach

Pass 3 (Strategic - document level):
- Sharpened Heilmeier catechism alignment
- Clarified 'what difference it makes' (economic impact)
- Strengthened 'what is new' positioning
- Enhanced 'why it will succeed' specificity
- Improved 'how we measure success' clarity

All changes maintain technical accuracy while improving clarity and impact.
2026-03-09 12:37:50 -04:00

73 lines
4.0 KiB
TeX

% GOAL PARAGRAPH
This research develops a methodology for creating autonomous control systems
with guaranteed safe and correct behavior.
% INTRODUCTORY PARAGRAPH Hook
Extensively trained operators manage nuclear reactor control by following detailed written procedures. These operators interpret plant conditions and decide when to switch between control objectives.
% Gap
Small modular reactors face a fundamental economic challenge: their per-megawatt staffing costs significantly exceed those of conventional plants. Without autonomous control, this economic constraint threatens their viability. Autonomous control systems must therefore manage complex operational sequences safely, without constant supervision, while providing assurance equal to—or better than—human-operated systems.
% APPROACH PARAGRAPH Solution
We combine formal methods from computer science with control theory to
build hybrid control systems that are correct by construction.
% Rationale
Hybrid systems mirror operator behavior: discrete
logic switches between continuous control modes. Existing formal methods
generate provably correct switching logic but fail to handle continuous dynamics
during transitions. Control theory verifies continuous behavior but
lacks tools to prove discrete switching correctness.
% Hypothesis and Technical Approach
A three-stage methodology bridges this gap. First, we translate written
operating procedures into temporal logic specifications using NASA's Formal
Requirements Elicitation Tool (FRET). FRET structures requirements into scope,
condition, component, timing, and response elements. Realizability
checking identifies conflicts and ambiguities before implementation.
Second, reactive synthesis generates deterministic automata provably
correct by construction.
Third, we design continuous controllers for each discrete mode using standard
control theory and verify them using reachability analysis. We classify continuous modes based on
their transition objectives, then employ assume-guarantee contracts and barrier
certificates to prove mode transitions occur safely. This approach enables local verification of continuous modes
without requiring global trajectory analysis across the entire hybrid system. An
Emerson Ovation control system demonstrates this methodology.
% Pay-off
This approach demonstrates that autonomous control can manage complex nuclear
power operations while maintaining safety guarantees, directly addressing the economic constraints threatening small modular reactor viability.
% OUTCOMES PARAGRAPHS
If this research is successful, we will be able to do the following:
\begin{enumerate}
% OUTCOME 1 Title
\item \textit{Synthesize written procedures into verified control logic.}
% Strategy
We will develop a methodology for converting written operating procedures
into formal specifications. Reactive synthesis tools generate
discrete control logic from these specifications.
% Outcome
Control engineers generate mode-switching controllers from regulatory
procedures with minimal formal methods expertise, reducing barriers to
high-assurance control systems.
% OUTCOME 2 Title
\item \textit{Verify continuous control behavior across mode transitions.}
% Strategy
Reachability analysis verifies that continuous control modes satisfy discrete
transition requirements.
% Outcome
Engineers design continuous controllers using standard practices while
maintaining formal correctness guarantees. Mode transitions provably occur safely and at
the correct times.
% OUTCOME 3 Title
\item \textit{Demonstrate autonomous reactor startup control with safety
guarantees.}
% Strategy
A small modular reactor simulation using industry-standard control hardware
implements this methodology.
% Outcome
Control engineers implement high-assurance autonomous controls on
industrial platforms they already use, enabling autonomy without retraining
costs or new equipment development.
\end{enumerate}