TACTICAL (sentence-level):
- Strengthened topic-stress positioning (old→new info flow)
- Replaced weak verbs with stronger active constructions
- Improved parallel structure in key passages
- Removed unnecessary passive voice
- Tightened verbose constructions
OPERATIONAL (paragraph/section):
- Improved transitions between major sections
- Enhanced coherence within subsections
- Clarified logical progression from state-of-art → approach
- Strengthened section linkages throughout
STRATEGIC (document-level):
- Reinforced Heilmeier catechism alignment (what's new, why succeed)
- Improved 'Why it will succeed' section with three-factor structure
- Added explicit transition from State of Art to Research Approach
- Removed distracting color markup
- Strengthened impact statements in Goals and Broader Impacts
Tactical (sentence-level):
- Applied Gopen's principles: improved topic-stress positioning, stronger verbs
- Reduced passive voice and unnecessary modifiers
- Split long sentences for clarity and emphasis
- Tightened redundant phrasing throughout
Operational (paragraph/section):
- Added explicit transitions between subsections
- Improved flow within paragraphs (e.g., control scopes example)
- Created parallel structure for related concepts
- Enhanced coherence in State of the Art section
Strategic (document-level):
- Strengthened value proposition (higher vs same assurance)
- Improved Heilmeier alignment (why now, what's new, why it will succeed)
- Better linkage between State of the Art gap and research goals
- Connected economic motivation more explicitly throughout
Pass 1 (Tactical): Sentence-level improvements
- Strengthened issue-point positioning (stress at sentence end)
- Improved topic-stress flow (known→new information)
- Converted passive to active voice where appropriate
- Tightened verb choice and eliminated weak constructions
- Fixed pronoun references and reduced unnecessary nominalizations
Pass 2 (Operational): Paragraph and section flow
- Improved transitions between paragraphs and subsections
- Strengthened section-to-section handoffs
- Enhanced coherence within major sections
- Clarified the discrete-continuous interface explanation
- Better signposting for the three controller types
Pass 3 (Strategic): Heilmeier catechism alignment
- Made 'What is new' and 'Why will it succeed' explicit
- Strengthened 'Who cares' and 'What difference' in Broader Impacts
- Clarified 'The exams' in Metrics section
- Added 'How long' statement to Schedule
- Improved overall narrative flow from problem→gap→solution→impact
All changes preserve technical accuracy while improving clarity and impact.
Tactical (sentence-level):
- Strengthened weak verbs and passive constructions
- Improved issue-point positioning (old info first, new info in stress position)
- Removed unnecessary hedging phrases
- Fixed active/passive voice for clarity
Operational (paragraph/section):
- Added transition sentences between major subsections
- Strengthened flow between State of the Art and Research Approach
- Added connecting tissue between continuous controller types
- Improved coherence within outcomes section
Strategic (document-level):
- Made 'what's new' explicit with highlighted innovation statement
- Added summary paragraph to State of the Art defining the verification gap
- Strengthened connections between sections for Heilmeier alignment
- Clarified how the three-layer approach unifies existing tools
- Created v3.tex with structure matching Thesis.RA tasks
- Added pyramid figure (strategic/operational/tactical hierarchy)
- Added hybrid automaton figure with guards and dynamics
- Wove in DICE abstract framing (gap, why now, two-layer approach)
- Split contributions marked in blue for review
- Switched main.tex to use v3
