PWR-HYBRID-3/OVERNIGHT_NOTES.md
Dane Sabo 7a1023e252 tight-entry heatup PJ: ALL 6 inv1_holds halfspaces discharged
Second heatup PJ probe with tightened X_entry (T_c width 6K vs
baseline 14K) gives:

  T=60s:  5710 sets in 101s — T_c envelope [281.05, 291.0] 
  T=300s: 12932 sets in 206s — T_c envelope [281.05, 291.0] 

T_c envelope STABLE (identical at 60s and 300s) — the tube reached
steady shape and stopped growing. Low-T_avg trip (280) cleared at
lower bound 281.05, ~1K margin.

**First sound nonlinear reach-avoid proof for any mode of this plant:**
for the tightened entry and T = 300s, every inv1_holds halfspace
holds along the tube.  Sound w.r.t. PJ dynamics (<= 0.1% error vs
full state).

The baseline wider-entry run was loose on T_c low bound (272.4),
confirming that the looseness was entry-box-width driven (14K too
wide for TMJets + orderQ=2) rather than intrinsic to the method.
Entry splitting / refinement is the path to the full baseline set.

Also: LaTeX preamble now has the unicode-to-math literate map
attached to the listing STYLES themselves (not just global \lstset),
so terminal-output listings pasted from Julia with Δ, ≥, °,  etc.
render correctly.  Journal 34 pages, clean build.

OVERNIGHT_NOTES.md updated with tight-entry win.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-21 15:01:13 -04:00

118 lines
5.2 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

# Overnight session summary
**Date:** 2026-04-20 → 2026-04-21 (overnight autonomous session)
Read this first when you open the laptop. Full details in
`journal/journal.pdf` (newest entry: `2026-04-20-overnight-prompt-jump.tex`).
## TL;DR
1. **Implemented the prompt-jump (singular-perturbation) PKE reduction**
in `code/src/pke_th_rhs_pj.jl`. State drops 10 → 9 (n algebraic).
Validated against full 10-state: max 0.1% relative error on n, max
7 mK on temperatures over 50 minutes of heatup. See
`docs/figures/validate_pj_heatup.png`.
2. **Nonlinear reach on heatup PJ: 30× horizon improvement + full
invariant discharge under tight entry.**
- Before: full-state hit prompt-neutron stiffness wall at T=10s.
- After PJ (baseline entry T_c ∈ [281, 295]): T=60s, T=300s sound,
5 of 6 `inv1_holds` halfspaces pass. Low-T_avg trip violated
by tube (272.4 vs 280) due to entry width + over-approximation.
- **After PJ + tight entry** (T_c ∈ [285, 291]): T=300s sound,
**all 6 `inv1_holds` halfspaces pass.** T_c envelope stable at
[281.05, 291.0] — tube reached steady envelope and stopped
growing. First sound nonlinear reach-avoid proof for this plant.
- T=1800s+ runs out of 100k step budget even with PJ. Bigger
budget or more tighter-entry refinement needed for longer
horizons.
3. **Scram PJ reach — landed.** All three probe horizons (10, 30, 60 s)
clean, no step-budget truncation. n decays monotonically:
`[0.0347 → 0.0155 → 0.00690]` at `[10s → 30s → 60s]`, factor-of-two
decay per 30 s matching delayed-neutron group 1 half-life.
**BUT:** `X_exit(scram) = n ≤ 1e-4` isn't reached in 60 s
(real `n ~ 7e-3`). T_max vs plant-decay-rate mismatch, not a control
failure. Three resolution options in the journal; I'd pick
"redefine X_exit as shutdown-margin halfspace" as the cleanest.
4. **App v2 (Pluto)** — three new cells in the predicate explorer:
- §9b: live ingestion of `reach_operation_result.mat`; per-halfspace
margins computed from JSON, rendered as a table with ✅/❌ badges.
- §9c: 2D projection chooser (pick any two of {n, T_f, T_c, T_cold}
and see the operating polytope + reach tube envelope).
- §9d: placeholder for PJ heatup reach overlay once the app learns
to read `reach_heatup_pj_result.mat`.
5. **Journal:** now 32 pages, rebuilds cleanly via `latexmk -pdf` in
`journal/`. Fixed a couple of LaTeX gotchas — `\degreeFahrenheit`,
`\microsecond`, and UTF-8 passthrough in `lstlisting` blocks.
## What's in this session's commits (most recent first)
- `0a8348e` walkthrough: PJ reach results (30× horizon win)
- `3fdf5ee` PJ reach 30× improvement (commits envelope summaries)
- `(earlier tonight)` prompt-jump model + app v2 + journal scaffold
## Things to look at in the morning
### Priority-1 (actual scientific content)
1. **Pull up `journal/journal.pdf`.** 32 pages, all the deep stuff.
Most relevant entry: `2026-04-20-overnight-prompt-jump.tex`.
2. **Look at `docs/figures/validate_pj_heatup.png`** — the visual
evidence that PJ is a sound reduction for slow heatup.
3. **Pluto app:**
```bash
cd app && julia --project=. -e 'using Pluto; Pluto.run()'
# open predicate_explorer.jl
```
§9b should show live margins from the refreshed reach result.
4. **Decide:** accept the 300s PJ tube as the headline heatup reach
artifact, or invest in refinement (tighter entry box, entry
splitting) to get past 1800s with the low-trip discharged.
### Priority-2 (followup ideas)
- `code/scripts/reach_heatup_pj_tight.jl` exists (committed but not
run tonight). Tighter T_c entry box; if a run has time, see
whether the low-trip tube bound rises above 280.
- `code/scripts/reach_scram_pj.jl` — scram reach. Either already in
the commit log by morning, or still running.
- Refinement (entry splitting into sub-boxes, unioning reach results)
is the textbook way to tighten tubes. Haven't implemented.
- Saturation-as-hybrid-sub-mode — still the open item for heatup
soundness.
- Polytopic/SOS barrier — still the open item for analytic
certificate.
- Parametric α uncertainty — still the open item for robust reach.
### What NOT to forget
- The PJ reduction introduces a ≤0.1% error. It's documented and
bounded, but it's an approximation. "Sound w.r.t. PJ dynamics"
≠ "sound w.r.t. physical plant." A Tikhonov-style closed-form
error bound would close this gap rigorously.
- Mode boundary numbers are still engineering guesses — pin to real
tech-spec values before defense.
- `reach_heatup_pj_result.mat` has *envelope summaries* at the probe
horizons, not the full time-varying tube. The app §9d overlay
placeholder needs the full tube if you want an animated plot.
## Context for whoever's picking this up
Starting commit tonight (pre-PJ work): `83c5cb8`.
Current HEAD: `0a8348e` + whatever scram produced.
Clean working tree expected (commits are atomic per task).
MATLAB is gone. Everything is Julia. Predicates JSON is the single
source of truth for numerical halfspaces. Journal is the narrative
source of truth. `claude_memory/` has short pointers.
Was fun to work on. Go read the overnight entry, grab coffee, pick
the next lever. 🦎
---
*— Hacker-Split, overnight 2026-04-20 → 2026-04-21*