58 lines
2.4 KiB
Markdown
58 lines
2.4 KiB
Markdown
# Table of Contents for 4 Presentation
|
||
|
||
## Files
|
||
- [[Building the Slides.md]]
|
||
- [[Outline.md]]
|
||
- [[Presentation Tasks.md]]
|
||
|
||
## Summary
|
||
It seems like you've generated a comprehensive outline for a research presentation on creating unstructured perturbations using diffusion models. The outline covers various aspects of the project, including goals, metrics of success, risks, and contingencies.
|
||
|
||
Here's a polished version of the outline:
|
||
|
||
**Title:** Creating Unstructured Perturbations with Diffusion Models
|
||
|
||
**I. Introduction**
|
||
|
||
* Brief overview of the importance of unstructured perturbations in robustness verification
|
||
* Research objectives:
|
||
+ Develop a method for creating unstructured perturbations using diffusion models
|
||
+ Evaluate the performance of the proposed approach
|
||
|
||
**II. Goals and Outcomes**
|
||
|
||
* Approximate unstructured sets through numerous perturbed plants
|
||
* Perturb nominal plants using the diffusion model
|
||
* Generate frequency-domain responses from training data
|
||
|
||
**III. Metrics of Success**
|
||
|
||
* Distribution: Verify uniform coverage of the multiplicative uncertainty disk
|
||
* Diversity: Assess non-parametric, dissimilar perturbations among examples
|
||
|
||
**IV. Risks and Contingencies**
|
||
|
||
* **Risk 1:** Computational demands of diffusion models
|
||
+ Utilize University of Pittsburgh's CRC supercomputing resources
|
||
+ Reduce data features while monitoring model performance
|
||
* **Risk 2:** Insufficient training data
|
||
+ Augment training with manually or algorithmically generated Δ examples
|
||
+ Diversify training data sources to improve robustness
|
||
* **Risk 3:** Interpolation limitations
|
||
+ Implement r(ℱt)-based reverse process steering for controlled perturbations
|
||
+ Explore alternative interpolation techniques tailored to frequency domain applications
|
||
|
||
**V. Statistical Evaluation**
|
||
|
||
* Standard statistical tests applied to the perturbation set
|
||
* Covariance vectors calculated for key frequency ranges
|
||
|
||
**VI. Risks and Contingencies Summary**
|
||
|
||
* Addressing risks proactively ensures project success
|
||
* Computational strategies, diversified training, and alternative steering methods safeguard outcomes
|
||
|
||
This outline provides a solid structure for your presentation, covering the research objectives, metrics of success, risks, and contingencies. Be sure to expand on each section and provide supporting evidence and visuals to enhance your presentation. Good luck with your presentation!
|
||
|
||
Generated by llama3.2:latest
|