Dane Sabo
e19888ad07
M Presentations/ERLM/bouncing_ball_hybrid.png M Presentations/ERLM/bouncing_ball_hybrid.py M Presentations/ERLM/main.aux M Presentations/ERLM/main.fdb_latexmk M Presentations/ERLM/main.fls M Presentations/ERLM/main.log M Presentations/ERLM/main.nav M Presentations/ERLM/main.pdf
74 lines
2.8 KiB
TeX
74 lines
2.8 KiB
TeX
\begin{frame}{Four primary risks with clear mitigation and contingency plans}
|
|
|
|
\begin{enumerate}
|
|
\item<1-> \alert<1>{\textbf{Computational Tractability of Synthesis}}
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item[] \textit{Risk:} Synthesis times exceed project timeline
|
|
\item[] \textit{Indicator:} $>$24hr for simplified procedures
|
|
\item[] \textit{Contingency:} Reduce to minimal viable startup sequence
|
|
\item[] \textit{Mitigation:} HPC resources, compositional verification
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
|
|
\item<2-> \alert<2>{\textbf{Discrete-Continuous Interface Complexity}}
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item[] \textit{Risk:} Boolean guards cannot map to continuous dynamics
|
|
\item[] \textit{Indicator:} No barrier certificates exist for transitions
|
|
\item[] \textit{Contingency:} Restrict to polytopic invariants
|
|
\item[] \textit{Mitigation:} Design controllers with transitions as constraints
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
|
|
\item<3-> \alert<3>{\textbf{Procedure Formalization Completeness}}
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item[] \textit{Risk:} Procedures lack precision for autonomous control
|
|
\item[] \textit{Indicator:} Multiple valid interpretations, operator judgment
|
|
\item[] \textit{Contingency:} Document gaps as research contribution
|
|
\item[] \textit{Mitigation:} Early analysis with domain experts
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
|
|
\item<4-> \alert<4>{\textbf{Hardware-in-the-Loop Integration}}
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item[] \textit{Risk:} Real-time constraints incompatible with hardware
|
|
\item[] \textit{Indicator:} Communication dropouts, missed deadlines
|
|
\item[] \textit{Contingency:} Software-in-the-loop with timing analysis (TRL 4)
|
|
\item[] \textit{Mitigation:} Early integration testing, ARCADE infrastructure
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
\end{enumerate}
|
|
|
|
\end{frame}
|
|
|
|
\begin{frame}{Staged structure ensures partial success yields valuable results}
|
|
|
|
\begin{columns}
|
|
\begin{column}{0.5\textwidth}
|
|
\begin{block}{Early Detection}
|
|
\small
|
|
Each risk has specific indicators for early warning
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item[] Quarterly assessment of progress
|
|
\item[] Data-driven plan revision only when assumptions invalidated
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
\end{block}
|
|
\end{column}
|
|
|
|
\begin{column}{0.5\textwidth}
|
|
\begin{block}{Research Value}
|
|
\small
|
|
Even contingency outcomes contribute knowledge
|
|
\begin{itemize}
|
|
\item[] Identifying barriers is itself valuable
|
|
\item[] Clear pathway for future work
|
|
\item[] Publishable results at each stage
|
|
\end{itemize}
|
|
\end{block}
|
|
\end{column}
|
|
\end{columns}
|
|
|
|
\vspace{1cm}
|
|
|
|
\begin{center}
|
|
\textbf{Contingency plans preserve core methodology\\
|
|
while adjusting scope to maintain feasibility}
|
|
\end{center}
|
|
|
|
\end{frame}
|