79 lines
4.3 KiB
Markdown
79 lines
4.3 KiB
Markdown
# Table of Contents for 101 Current Writing
|
|
|
|
## Subdirectories
|
|
- [[ANS NPIC HITL FHE/ANS NPIC HITL FHE - README]]
|
|
|
|
## Files
|
|
- [[ARCADE Implementation at the University of Pittsburgh.md]]
|
|
- [[Models All The Way Down - A Path Towards Software and Physical System Proof Synergy.md]]
|
|
|
|
## Summary
|
|
I think your proposed layout is excellent. It provides a clear and concise structure for presenting the research vision, background, proposed approach, challenges, and broader impact.
|
|
|
|
Here are some minor suggestions to further improve your layout:
|
|
|
|
1. **Introduction**: Consider adding a brief paragraph that highlights the significance of the research and its potential to address pressing cybersecurity concerns in industrial control systems.
|
|
2. **Background and Related Work**: Break up the bullet points into smaller sections or use subheadings to make it easier to follow. For example:
|
|
* PLCs and Industrial Control Systems: Characteristics, Challenges, and Current State
|
|
* Hardware-in-the-Loop Simulation: Overview, Current Players, and ARCADE Integration
|
|
3. **Proposed Approach**: Emphasize the innovative aspects of your approach by using bold headings or highlighting key takeaways. For example:
|
|
* **ARCADE Setup at Pitt**: Successful integration with KOS and Beagleboards
|
|
* **Why Our Approach is the Way to Go**: Unique blend of security, control engineering, and education
|
|
4. **Challenges and Limitations**: Use a clear and concise format to present the challenges and limitations. Consider using bullet points or numbered lists to make it easier to read.
|
|
5. **Broader Impact**: Use bold headings or highlight key phrases to emphasize the broader impact of your research. For example:
|
|
* **Cybersecurity Elimination**: Potential for eliminating cybersecurity threats by integrating secure-by-design systems
|
|
* **Control of Critical Infrastructure**: Demonstration of control capabilities with seL4-based systems
|
|
6. **Conclusion**: Summarize the main points and reiterate the significance of the research.
|
|
7. **References**: Use a consistent format throughout, and consider adding a brief note on how to access or retrieve the references.
|
|
|
|
Here's an updated version of your layout with these suggestions incorporated:
|
|
|
|
### 1. Introduction
|
|
|
|
Our research aims to address the pressing cybersecurity concerns in industrial control systems by integrating secure-by-design operating systems and mathematically verified kernels into existing architectures.
|
|
|
|
### 2. Background and Related Work
|
|
|
|
#### PLCs and Industrial Control Systems: Characteristics, Challenges, and Current State
|
|
• Characteristics of PLCs: Open-source, proprietary, closed-source
|
|
• Challenges in industrial control systems: Cybersecurity, heterogeneity, scalability
|
|
|
|
#### Hardware-in-the-Loop Simulation: Overview, Current Players, and ARCADE Integration
|
|
• Overview: Simulation environment for testing and validation
|
|
• Current players: MATLAB, dSpace
|
|
• ARCADE integration: Enabling secure-by-design simulation
|
|
|
|
#### Secure Operating Kernels
|
|
• seL4: Mathematically verified kernel with security guarantees
|
|
• Littlebird paper: Research on seL4-based systems for industrial control
|
|
• kOS: Open-source kernel with security and performance focus
|
|
|
|
### 3. Proposed Approach
|
|
|
|
#### ARCADE Setup at Pitt
|
|
• Successful integration with KOS and Beagleboards
|
|
• Enabling secure-by-design simulation and testing
|
|
|
|
#### Why Our Approach is the Way to Go
|
|
• Unique blend of security, control engineering, and education
|
|
• Potential for eliminating cybersecurity threats by integrating secure-by-design systems
|
|
|
|
### 4. Challenges and Limitations
|
|
|
|
* **Education of Engineers**: Blending of CS and control engineering expertise
|
|
* **Protection Domains and Capabilities**: New concepts in industrial control system design
|
|
* **Upgrade Costs**: Regulatory hurdles with seL4-based systems
|
|
|
|
### 5. Broader Impact
|
|
|
|
* **Cybersecurity Elimination**: Potential for eliminating cybersecurity threats by integrating secure-by-design systems
|
|
* **Control of Critical Infrastructure**: Demonstration of control capabilities with seL4-based systems
|
|
|
|
### 6. Conclusion
|
|
|
|
Our research aims to address the pressing cybersecurity concerns in industrial control systems by integrating secure-by-design operating systems and mathematically verified kernels into existing architectures.
|
|
|
|
### 7. References
|
|
|
|
Generated by llama3.2:latest
|