71 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
71 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
readstatus: false
|
|
dateread:
|
|
title: "Guaranteed margins for LQG regulators"
|
|
year: 1978
|
|
authors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
- "Doyle, J."
|
|
|
|
|
|
citekey: "doyleGuaranteedMarginsLQG1978"
|
|
|
|
journal: "IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control"
|
|
|
|
|
|
volume: 23
|
|
|
|
|
|
issue: 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pages: 756-757
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
# Indexing Information
|
|
## DOI
|
|
[10.1109/TAC.1978.1101812](https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1978.1101812)
|
|
## ISBN
|
|
[](https://www.isbnsearch.org/isbn/)
|
|
## Tags:
|
|
#Algorithm-design-and-analysis, #Filters, #Gain, #Guidelines, #Noise-measurement, #Open-loop-systems, #Regulators, #Robustness, #Three-term-control, #White-noise
|
|
|
|
>[!Abstract]
|
|
>There are none.
|
|
|
|
>[!note] Markdown Notes
|
|
>OG Doyle paper that started Robust Control
|
|
|
|
>[!seealso] Related Papers
|
|
>[Feedback Control Theory](doyleFeedbackControlTheory2009)
|
|
|
|
# Annotations
|
|
|
|
>[!question] Don't Understand
|
|
> *Considerable attention has been given lately to the issue of robustness of linear-quadratic (LQ) regulators.*
|
|
>
|
|
|
|
>[!question] Don't Understand
|
|
> *The full systcm matrix then becomes*
|
|
>
|
|
> >[!note] Note
|
|
> >Look up LQR full system
|
|
|
|
>[!question] Don't Understand
|
|
> *Evaluation of the characteristic polynomial is rather tedious, but reveals that only the last two terms are functions of m*
|
|
>
|
|
> >[!note] Note
|
|
> >Where did 'm' come from?
|
|
|
|
>[!done] Quote
|
|
> *point of these examples is that LQG solutions, unlike LQ solu- tions, provide no global system-independent guaranteed robustness properties. Like their more classical colleagues, modern LQG designers are obliged to test their margins for each speafic design.*
|
|
>
|
|
|
|
### Imported: 2024-10-16 9:25 am
|
|
|
|
|