38 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
38 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
Dane Sabo
|
||
|
||
NUCE 2122 - Summer 2025
|
||
|
||
# Instructions
|
||
Submit a 500 work analysis predicting two major events and specific locations
|
||
that in your estimation have a high probability to occur in the next five years
|
||
regarding nuclear operating and construction plants
|
||
|
||
In support of this, review the list of prematurely shutdown nuclear plants,
|
||
review the new plant licensing status as it exists in several states, review the
|
||
projected load growth data for the key states we discussed and predict
|
||
locations where two events associated with additional nuclear plants will
|
||
occur.
|
||
|
||
Events to be evaluated:
|
||
|
||
1. A shutdown plant will be restarted (Do not count Palisades or TMI)
|
||
2. A partially completed nuclear plant construction restarted
|
||
3. A new contract for a new nuclear plant signed and construction begun.
|
||
|
||
Evaluate your target locations by:
|
||
- their predicted electricity consumption growth;
|
||
- the availability of purchased power from a neighboring state;
|
||
- the current fuel balance issues faced in that location;
|
||
- and any reduction in the number of resource energy plants that were
|
||
originally scheduled to be constructed per the utility’s strategic plans
|
||
|
||
# Submission
|
||
## Vermont Yankee Restarting
|
||
- Vermont Yankee is one of the most recent nuclear reactors to be
|
||
decomissioned, and notably, was because of economic factors.
|
||
This makes Vermont Yankee an ideal candidate to restart.
|
||
- NIMBYs in the area HATE Vermont Yankee. The state senate tried
|
||
to block its license extension, but the NRC approved it anyway. The
|
||
utility sued the state to stay open and won.
|
||
-
|
||
|