Dane Sabo
2497bb4aa5
M .task/backlog.data M .task/completed.data M .task/pending.data M .task/undo.data A PLAN_OF_STUDY_111225.pdf R Writing/202510270-Emerson-Pres/SaboOneSlide.pdf -> Presentations/202510270-Emerson-Pres/SaboOneSlide.pdf R Writing/202510270-Emerson-Pres/beamerthemedane.sty -> Presentations/202510270-Emerson-Pres/beamerthemedane.sty R Writing/202510270-Emerson-Pres/beamerthemedane_native.sty -> Presentations/202510270-Emerson-Pres/beamerthemedane_native.sty
61 lines
2.1 KiB
TeX
61 lines
2.1 KiB
TeX
% Expected Outcomes
|
|
\begin{frame}{Success measured by progression to TRL 5---practical feasibility beyond theory}
|
|
|
|
\begin{center}
|
|
\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=0.9, transform shape]
|
|
\draw[->, >=stealth, very thick] (0,0) -- (11,0) node[right] {TRL};
|
|
|
|
% TRL markers
|
|
\foreach \x/\label in {1/1, 3/2-3, 5.5/4, 8/5, 10/6} {
|
|
\draw[thick] (\x,0.1) -- (\x,-0.1);
|
|
\node[below] at (\x,-0.2) {\small\label};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
% Starting point
|
|
\node[circle, fill=red, minimum size=0.3cm, label=above:{\small Current}] at (3,0) {};
|
|
\node[below=1cm of {(3,0)}, align=center, font=\tiny] {HARDENS\\TRL 3-4};
|
|
|
|
% Target
|
|
\node[circle, fill=green, minimum size=0.3cm, label=above:{\small\textbf{Target}}] at (8,0) {};
|
|
\node[below=1cm of {(8,0)}, align=center, font=\tiny, text width=2.5cm] {Hardware-in-loop\\validated};
|
|
|
|
% Arrow
|
|
\draw[->, >=stealth, very thick, blue] (3.5,0.5) -- (7.5,0.5) node[midway, above] {\textbf{This Work}};
|
|
\end{tikzpicture}
|
|
\end{center}
|
|
|
|
\vspace{0.5cm}
|
|
|
|
\textbf{Three Deliverables:}
|
|
|
|
\begin{enumerate}
|
|
\item Procedure translation methodology
|
|
\item Continuous verification framework
|
|
\item SmAHTR demonstration on Emerson Ovation
|
|
\end{enumerate}
|
|
|
|
%SPEAKER NOTES: See comments below
|
|
%
|
|
\textbf{Technology Readiness Level Progression:}
|
|
Current: TRL 2-3 (basic concepts, HARDENS precedent)
|
|
Target: TRL 5 (validated prototype in relevant environment)
|
|
|
|
\textbf{Three Concrete Deliverables:}
|
|
|
|
1. Procedure Translation Methodology
|
|
- Engineers generate verified controllers from regulatory procedures
|
|
- No formal methods expertise required
|
|
|
|
2. Continuous Verification Framework
|
|
- Standard control design + iterative verification
|
|
- Mathematical proof of safe mode transitions
|
|
|
|
3. SmAHTR Hardware-in-the-Loop Demonstration
|
|
- Autonomous startup on industrial control hardware
|
|
- Real-time performance validation
|
|
- Clear path to deployment
|
|
|
|
\textbf{Key Message:} TRL 5 proves both theoretical validity and practical implementability
|
|
% (End of speaker notes)
|
|
\end{frame}
|