M .task/backlog.data M .task/completed.data M .task/pending.data M .task/undo.data A PLAN_OF_STUDY_111225.pdf R Writing/202510270-Emerson-Pres/SaboOneSlide.pdf -> Presentations/202510270-Emerson-Pres/SaboOneSlide.pdf R Writing/202510270-Emerson-Pres/beamerthemedane.sty -> Presentations/202510270-Emerson-Pres/beamerthemedane.sty R Writing/202510270-Emerson-Pres/beamerthemedane_native.sty -> Presentations/202510270-Emerson-Pres/beamerthemedane_native.sty
41 lines
1.8 KiB
TeX
41 lines
1.8 KiB
TeX
% Demonstration
|
|
\begin{frame}{Demonstration: SmAHTR autonomous startup provides a rigorous test case}
|
|
|
|
\begin{center}
|
|
\begin{tikzpicture}
|
|
\draw[thick, fill=gray!20] (0,0) rectangle (12,7);
|
|
\node[align=center, text width=10cm] at (6,3.5) {
|
|
\textbf{FIGURE: SmAHTR Hardware-in-Loop Setup}\\[0.3cm]
|
|
Top: SmAHTR reactor diagram\\
|
|
(liquid-salt cooled, representative SMR)\\[0.3cm]
|
|
Middle: Hardware-in-loop architecture\\
|
|
Simulink Model $\leftrightarrow$ ARCADE $\leftrightarrow$ Emerson Ovation\\[0.3cm]
|
|
Bottom: Startup sequence state machine\\
|
|
Cold $\rightarrow$ Heat $\rightarrow$ Criticality $\rightarrow$ Low Power $\rightarrow$ Full Power\\
|
|
Show continuous trajectories within each state
|
|
};
|
|
\end{tikzpicture}
|
|
\end{center}
|
|
|
|
%SPEAKER NOTES: See comments below
|
|
%
|
|
\textbf{Small Modular Advanced High Temperature Reactor (SmAHTR):}
|
|
- Liquid-salt cooled reactor design
|
|
- Well-documented startup procedures
|
|
- Representative of next-generation SMR designs
|
|
|
|
\textbf{Startup Sequence:} Cold → Controlled Heating → Approach Criticality → Low-Power Physics → Full Power
|
|
Each mode has different control objective (temp control, ramp rate, reactivity, neutron flux, load following)
|
|
|
|
\textbf{Implementation Platform:}
|
|
- Simulation: High-fidelity Simulink model (thermal-hydraulics + neutron kinetics)
|
|
- Hardware: Emerson Ovation control system (industry standard)
|
|
- Integration: ARCADE platform (hardware-in-the-loop)
|
|
- Validation: Real-time performance on actual control equipment
|
|
|
|
\textbf{Why This Matters:}
|
|
Multiple coordinated subsystems, strict timing/temperature constraints, complex nonlinear dynamics.
|
|
This is not a toy problem---it's representative of deployment challenges.
|
|
% (End of speaker notes)
|
|
\end{frame}
|