170 lines
14 KiB
TeX
170 lines
14 KiB
TeX
\relax
|
|
\providecommand \oddpage@label [2]{}
|
|
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{Contents}{1}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {1}Goals and Outcomes}{1}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\citation{NUREG-0899,10CFR50.34}
|
|
\citation{10CFR55.59}
|
|
\citation{WRPS.Description,gentillon_westinghouse_1999}
|
|
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2}State of the Art and Limits of Current Practice}{3}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\@writefile{tdo}{\contentsline {todo}{\fcolorbox {black}{green!40}{\textcolor {green!40}{o}}\ Good roadmap — tells reader exactly what's coming.}{3}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid1}{21980756}{40762302}
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid4}{31254300}{40736566}
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid5}{35899615}{40496882}
|
|
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.1}Current Reactor Procedures and Operation}{3}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\@writefile{tdo}{\contentsline {todo}{\fcolorbox {black}{yellow!60}{\textcolor {yellow!60}{o}}\ This paragraph is doing a lot. Consider splitting: first paragraph on the hierarchy and compliance, second on the lack of formal verification. The ``No mathematical proof exists...'' sentence is powerful and deserves emphasis.}{3}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid6}{20423612}{24880744}
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid9}{31254300}{24855008}
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid10}{35899615}{24615324}
|
|
\@writefile{tdo}{\contentsline {todo}{\fcolorbox {black}{orange!50}{\textcolor {orange!50}{o}}\ This repeats the ``No mathematical proof exists...'' sentence almost verbatim from the paragraph above. Either cut it from the paragraph or from the LIMITATION box.}{3}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid11}{13626615}{17278568}
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid14}{31254300}{16022170}
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid15}{35899615}{15782486}
|
|
\citation{operator_statistics}
|
|
\citation{10CFR55}
|
|
\citation{10CFR50.54}
|
|
\citation{Kemeny1979}
|
|
\citation{WNA2020}
|
|
\citation{hogberg_root_2013}
|
|
\citation{zhang_analysis_2025}
|
|
\citation{Kiniry2024}
|
|
\@writefile{tdo}{\contentsline {todo}{\fcolorbox {black}{green!40}{\textcolor {green!40}{o}}\ This is the key insight — the hybrid nature is already there, just not formally verified.}{4}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid16}{14097656}{42090495}
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid19}{31254300}{42064759}
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid20}{35899615}{41825075}
|
|
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.2}Human Factors in Nuclear Accidents}{4}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\@writefile{tdo}{\contentsline {todo}{\fcolorbox {black}{green!40}{\textcolor {green!40}{o}}\ Strong thesis for this subsection.}{4}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid21}{5927496}{30010025}
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid24}{31254300}{29984289}
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid25}{35899615}{29744605}
|
|
\@writefile{tdo}{\contentsline {todo}{\fcolorbox {black}{green!40}{\textcolor {green!40}{o}}\ ``the person responsible for reactor safety is often the root cause of failures'' — devastating summary. Very effective.}{4}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid26}{4915358}{19557033}
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid29}{31254300}{19531297}
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid30}{35899615}{19291613}
|
|
\@writefile{tdo}{\contentsline {todo}{\fcolorbox {black}{green!40}{\textcolor {green!40}{o}}\ Strong empirical grounding. The Chinese plant data is a nice addition — shows this isn't just a Western regulatory perspective.}{4}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid31}{4609444}{10054313}
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid34}{31254300}{10028577}
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid35}{35899615}{9788893}
|
|
\@writefile{tdo}{\contentsline {todo}{\fcolorbox {black}{green!40}{\textcolor {green!40}{o}}\ Well-stated. The ``four decades'' point drives it home.}{4}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid36}{4792689}{5302953}
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid39}{31254300}{4760899}
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid40}{35899615}{4521215}
|
|
\citation{Kiniry2024}
|
|
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {2.3}Formal Methods}{5}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {2.3.1}HARDENS}{5}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\@writefile{tdo}{\contentsline {todo}{\fcolorbox {black}{green!40}{\textcolor {green!40}{o}}\ Good technical depth on HARDENS toolchain.}{5}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid41}{20999294}{21457577}
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid44}{31254300}{21431841}
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid45}{35899615}{21192157}
|
|
\@writefile{tdo}{\contentsline {todo}{\fcolorbox {black}{green!40}{\textcolor {green!40}{o}}\ Clear articulation of the gap your work fills.}{5}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid46}{23128957}{11004585}
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid49}{31254300}{10978849}
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid50}{35899615}{10739165}
|
|
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {2.3.2}Sequent Calculus and Differential Dynamic Logic}{6}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\@writefile{tdo}{\contentsline {todo}{\fcolorbox {black}{red!40}{\textcolor {red!40}{o}}\ Typo: ``ivariant'' should be ``invariant''}{6}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid51}{4749422}{20507305}
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid54}{31254300}{20481569}
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid55}{35899615}{20241885}
|
|
\@writefile{tdo}{\contentsline {todo}{\fcolorbox {black}{yellow!60}{\textcolor {yellow!60}{o}}\ Consider adding a concrete example here — ``For instance, a system with N modes and M continuous state variables...'' to give readers a sense of the scaling problem.}{6}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid56}{18750152}{12905129}
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid59}{31254300}{12879393}
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid60}{35899615}{12639709}
|
|
\@writefile{tdo}{\contentsline {todo}{\fcolorbox {black}{orange!50}{\textcolor {orange!50}{o}}\ ``but are far from a complete methodology to design systems with'' — awkward ending preposition. Try: ``but remain far from a complete design methodology'' or ``but do not yet constitute a complete design methodology.''}{6}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid61}{8940582}{10054313}
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid64}{31254300}{5829135}
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid65}{35899615}{5589451}
|
|
\@writefile{tdo}{\contentsline {todo}{\fcolorbox {black}{green!40}{\textcolor {green!40}{o}}\ Your comment here is spot-on. You should add a LIMITATION box: \textit {Differential dynamic logic has been used for post-hoc analysis of existing systems, not for the constructive design of autonomous controllers.} This is exactly the gap you're filling — you're doing synthesis, not just verification.}{6}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid66}{14192475}{45403152}
|
|
\citation{HANDBOOK ON HYBRID SYSTEMS}
|
|
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {3}Research Approach}{8}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\@writefile{tdo}{\contentsline {todo}{\fcolorbox {black}{orange!50}{\textcolor {orange!50}{o}}\ Missing space before ``Our}{8}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid67}{21351522}{32209854}
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid70}{31254300}{32184118}
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid71}{35899615}{31944434}
|
|
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces Simplified hybrid automaton for reactor startup. Each discrete state $q_i$ has associated continuous dynamics $f_i$. Guard conditions on transitions (e.g., $T_{avg} > T_{min}$) are predicates over continuous state. Invariant violations ($\neg Inv_i$) trigger transitions to the SCRAM state. The operational level manages discrete transitions; the tactical level executes continuous control within each mode.}}{9}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\newlabel{fig:hybrid_automaton}{{1}{9}{Research Approach}{figure.1}{}}
|
|
\@writefile{tdo}{\contentsline {todo}{\fcolorbox {black}{green!40}{\textcolor {green!40}{o}}\ This is your key insight — the novelty is compositional, not component-level.}{9}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid72}{5905037}{17221912}
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid75}{31254300}{17196176}
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid76}{35899615}{16956492}
|
|
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.1}System Requirements, Specifications, and Discrete Controllers}{9}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces Control scope hierarchy in nuclear power operations. Strategic control (long-term planning) remains with human management. HAHACS addresses the operational level (discrete mode switching) and tactical level (continuous control within modes), which together form a hybrid control system.}}{10}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\newlabel{fig:strat_op_tact}{{2}{10}{System Requirements, Specifications, and Discrete Controllers}{figure.2}{}}
|
|
\citation{MANYUS THESIS}
|
|
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.2}Continuous Control Modes}{13}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\@writefile{tdo}{\contentsline {todo}{\fcolorbox {black}{green!40}{\textcolor {green!40}{o}}\ This three-mode taxonomy is elegant — maps verification tools to control objectives cleanly.}{14}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid79}{15985073}{33177599}
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid82}{31254300}{33151863}
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid83}{35899615}{32912179}
|
|
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {3.2.1}Transitory Modes}{14}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {3.2.2}Stabilizing Modes}{15}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {3.2.3}Expulsory Modes}{16}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.3}Industrial Implementation}{17}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\@writefile{tdo}{\contentsline {todo}{\fcolorbox {black}{red!40}{\textcolor {red!40}{o}}\ Typo: ``excess should be ``access}{17}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid84}{25258844}{17656489}
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid87}{31254300}{17630753}
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid88}{35899615}{17391069}
|
|
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4}Metrics for Success}{18}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\@writefile{tdo}{\contentsline {todo}{\fcolorbox {black}{green!40}{\textcolor {green!40}{o}}\ TRL as primary metric is smart — speaks industry language.}{18}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid89}{6508678}{41712574}
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid92}{31254300}{41686838}
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid93}{35899615}{41447154}
|
|
\@writefile{tdo}{\contentsline {todo}{\fcolorbox {black}{green!40}{\textcolor {green!40}{o}}\ Good framing — explains why other metrics are insufficient.}{18}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid94}{7276206}{33160126}
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid97}{31254300}{33134390}
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid98}{35899615}{32894706}
|
|
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{TRL 3 \textit {Critical Function and Proof of Concept}}{18}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{TRL 4 \textit {Laboratory Testing of Integrated Components}}{18}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {paragraph}{TRL 5 \textit {Laboratory Testing in Relevant Environment}}{19}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\@writefile{tdo}{\contentsline {todo}{\fcolorbox {black}{yellow!60}{\textcolor {yellow!60}{o}}\ Consider noting why graded responses are out of scope — is it time, complexity, or scope creep? Brief justification helps.}{19}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid99}{15785403}{27497812}
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid102}{31254300}{27472076}
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid103}{35899615}{27232392}
|
|
\@writefile{tdo}{\contentsline {todo}{\fcolorbox {black}{green!40}{\textcolor {green!40}{o}}\ Clear success criteria. Committee will know exactly what ``done'' looks like.}{19}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid104}{13547172}{12293460}
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid107}{31254300}{12267724}
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid108}{35899615}{12028040}
|
|
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {5}Risks and Contingencies}{20}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\@writefile{tdo}{\contentsline {todo}{\fcolorbox {black}{green!40}{\textcolor {green!40}{o}}\ Honest acknowledgment of risks with clear contingencies — committee will appreciate this.}{20}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid109}{19227927}{44563390}
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid112}{31254300}{44537654}
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid113}{35899615}{44297970}
|
|
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.1}Computational Tractability of Synthesis}{20}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.2}Discrete-Continuous Interface Formalization}{20}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.3}Procedure Formalization Completeness}{22}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\citation{eia_lcoe_2022}
|
|
\citation{eesi_datacenter_2024}
|
|
\citation{eia_lcoe_2022}
|
|
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {6}Broader Impacts}{24}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\@writefile{tdo}{\contentsline {todo}{\fcolorbox {black}{green!40}{\textcolor {green!40}{o}}\ ``If it works here, it works anywhere — strong closing argument.}{25}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid114}{19399794}{25935871}
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid117}{31254300}{25910135}
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid118}{35899615}{25670451}
|
|
\bibstyle{ieeetr}
|
|
\bibdata{references}
|
|
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {7}Schedule, Milestones, and Deliverables}{26}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\gtt@chartextrasize{0}{164.1287pt}
|
|
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces Project schedule showing major research thrusts, milestones (orange row), and publications (green row). Red diamonds indicate completion points. Overlapping bars indicate parallel work where appropriate.}}{26}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\newlabel{fig:gantt}{{3}{26}{Schedule, Milestones, and Deliverables}{figure.3}{}}
|
|
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {7.1}Milestones and Deliverables}{26}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\bibcite{NUREG-0899}{1}
|
|
\bibcite{10CFR50.34}{2}
|
|
\bibcite{10CFR55.59}{3}
|
|
\bibcite{WRPS.Description}{4}
|
|
\bibcite{gentillon_westinghouse_1999}{5}
|
|
\bibcite{operator_statistics}{6}
|
|
\bibcite{10CFR55}{7}
|
|
\bibcite{10CFR50.54}{8}
|
|
\bibcite{Kemeny1979}{9}
|
|
\bibcite{WNA2020}{10}
|
|
\@writefile{tdo}{\contentsline {todo}{\fcolorbox {black}{green!40}{\textcolor {green!40}{o}}\ Clear timeline with publication targets — shows you have a plan.}{27}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid120}{4865044}{36388863}
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid123}{31254300}{36363127}
|
|
\pgfsyspdfmark {pgfid124}{35899615}{36123443}
|
|
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{References}{27}{}\protected@file@percent }
|
|
\bibcite{hogberg_root_2013}{11}
|
|
\bibcite{zhang_analysis_2025}{12}
|
|
\bibcite{Kiniry2024}{13}
|
|
\bibcite{eia_lcoe_2022}{14}
|
|
\bibcite{eesi_datacenter_2024}{15}
|
|
\gdef \@abspage@last{30}
|