Fix two LaTeX errors: remove itemize from dasinline (line 429), remove stray brace (line 673)
This commit is contained in:
parent
96af36972f
commit
f1691e24c4
@ -421,12 +421,9 @@ We classify continuous controllers into three types based on their objectives:
|
||||
transitory, stabilizing, and expulsory. Each type has distinct verification
|
||||
requirements that determine which formal methods tools are appropriate.
|
||||
|
||||
\dasinline{
|
||||
\begin{itemize}
|
||||
\item Add figure showing the relationship between entry/exit/safety sets
|
||||
\item Mention assume guarantee compositional stuff and how that fits in here
|
||||
\end{itemize}
|
||||
}
|
||||
\dasinline{(1) Add figure showing the relationship between entry/exit/safety
|
||||
sets. (2) Mention assume-guarantee compositional stuff and how that fits in
|
||||
here.}
|
||||
|
||||
\subsubsection{Transitory Modes}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -673,7 +670,7 @@ The Emerson collaboration strengthens this work in two ways. Access to
|
||||
system experts at Emerson ensures that implementation details of the Ovation
|
||||
platform are handled correctly. Direct industry collaboration also provides an
|
||||
immediate pathway for technology transfer and alignment with practical
|
||||
deployment requirements.}\splitnote{Kapuria 2025 validates hybrid control on
|
||||
deployment requirements.\splitnote{Kapuria 2025 validates hybrid control on
|
||||
SmAHTR: formal verification (d$\mathcal{L}$ + reachability, pp.37-70) proved
|
||||
safe PHX maintenance scenario, then Simulink demo confirmed (pp.70-72). This
|
||||
two-tier approach (formal proof + simulation validation) strengthens your
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user