Convert dense margin comments to inline to fix line tracing

Reduced marginpar collisions from 12 to 3 by converting multi-line
suggestions/polish comments to \splitinline{} in research-statement.tex
and goals.tex. Remaining warnings are spread across different pages
(4, 5, 7) and no longer cluster/cross.

1-goals-and-outcomes/goals.tex

@@ -18,9 +18,10 @@ conditions and procedural guidance.
 % Gap
 This reliance on human operators prevents autonomous control capabilities and
 creates a fundamental economic challenge for next-generation reactor 
-designs.\splitsuggest{The ``and'' here joins two distinct issues (autonomy 
+designs.
-barrier + economics). Consider making the causal link explicit: ``This reliance 
+\splitinline{The ``and'' here joins two distinct issues (autonomy barrier + 
-on human operators not only prevents autonomous control capabilities but also 
+economics). Consider making the causal link explicit: ``This reliance on human 
+operators not only prevents autonomous control capabilities but also 
 creates...'' or split into two sentences.}
 Small modular reactors, in particular, face per-megawatt staffing costs far
 exceeding those of conventional plants and threaten their economic viability.
@@ -28,10 +29,11 @@ exceeding those of conventional plants and threaten their economic viability.
 % Critical Need
 What is needed is a method to create autonomous control systems that safely
 manage complex operational sequences with the same assurance as human-operated
-systems, but without constant human supervision.\splitpolish{``What is needed 
+systems, but without constant human supervision.
-is'' — Gopen would call this a weak topic position. The sentence buries the 
+\splitinline{``What is needed is'' — Gopen would call this a weak topic 
-subject. Try: ``Autonomous control systems must safely manage complex 
+position. The sentence buries the subject. Try: ``Autonomous control systems 
-operational sequences...'' Puts the actor in the topic position.}
+must safely manage complex operational sequences...'' Puts the actor in the 
+topic position.}
 % APPROACH PARAGRAPH Solution
 To address this need, we will combine formal methods with control theory to
 build hybrid control systems that are correct by construction.
@@ -60,9 +62,10 @@ maintaining the high safety standards required by the industry.
 This work is conducted within the University of Pittsburgh Cyber Energy Center,
 which provides access to industry collaboration and Emerson control hardware,
 ensuring that developed solutions align with practical implementation
-requirements.\splitsuggest{This qualifications paragraph feels orphaned here. 
+requirements.
-It's important context but reads as an afterthought. Consider integrating it 
+\splitinline{This qualifications paragraph feels orphaned here. It's important 
-into the approach paragraph (``...demonstrated on Emerson hardware through our 
+context but reads as an afterthought. Consider integrating it into the 
+approach paragraph (``...demonstrated on Emerson hardware through our 
 partnership with the Cyber Energy Center'') or moving to a ``Why This Will 
 Succeed'' framing later.}
 

1-goals-and-outcomes/research-statement.tex

@@ -7,19 +7,23 @@ correct behavior.\splitnote{Strong, direct opening. Sets scope immediately.}
 Nuclear power relies on extensively trained operators who follow detailed
 written procedures to manage reactor control. Based on these procedures and
 operators' interpretation of plant conditions, operators make critical decisions
-about when to switch between control objectives.\splitsuggest{Consider: 
+about when to switch between control objectives.
-``operators'' appears 3x in two sentences. Maybe: ``Based on these procedures 
+\splitinline{Consider: ``operators'' appears 3x in two sentences. Maybe: 
-and their interpretation of plant conditions, they make critical decisions...''}
+``Based on these procedures and their interpretation of plant conditions, 
+they make critical decisions...''}
 % Gap
 But, reliance on human operators has created an economic challenge for
-next-generation nuclear power plants.\splitpolish{``But, reliance'' — the comma 
+next-generation nuclear power plants.
-after ``But'' is unusual. Either drop it or restructure: ``However, this 
+\splitinline{``But, reliance'' — the comma after ``But'' is unusual. Either 
-reliance...'' or ``This reliance, however, has created...''} Small modular 
+drop it or restructure: ``However, this reliance...'' or ``This reliance, 
-reactors face significantly higher per-megawatt staffing costs than conventional 
+however, has created...''}
+Small modular reactors face significantly higher per-megawatt staffing costs 
+than conventional 
 plants. Autonomous control systems are needed that can safely manage complex 
 operational sequences with the same assurance as human-operated systems, but 
-without constant supervision.\splitsuggest{``are needed that can'' — passive. 
+without constant supervision.
-Try: ``Autonomous control systems must safely manage...''}
+\splitinline{``are needed that can'' — passive. Try: ``Autonomous control 
+systems must safely manage...''}
 
 % APPROACH PARAGRAPH Solution
 To address this need, we will combine formal methods from computer science with
@@ -49,14 +53,16 @@ certificates to prove that mode transitions occur safely and as defined by the
 deterministic automata. This compositional approach enables local verification
 of continuous modes without requiring global trajectory analysis across the
 entire hybrid system. We will demonstrate this on an Emerson Ovation control 
-system.\splitsuggest{This paragraph is dense. Consider breaking after the 
+system.
-three stages, then a new paragraph for the compositional verification point 
+\splitinline{This paragraph is dense. Consider breaking after the three 
-and Emerson demo.}
+stages, then a new paragraph for the compositional verification point and 
+Emerson demo.}
 % Pay-off
 This approach will demonstrate autonomous control can be used for complex
 nuclear power operations while maintaining safety 
-guarantees.\splitpolish{``can be used for'' — weak. Try: ``...will demonstrate 
+guarantees.
-that autonomous control can manage complex nuclear power operations while 
+\splitinline{``can be used for'' — weak. Try: ``...will demonstrate that 
+autonomous control can manage complex nuclear power operations while 
 maintaining safety guarantees.'' Or even stronger: ``...enables autonomous 
 management of complex nuclear power operations with safety guarantees.''}