Rewrap citation audit to 60-char lines

citation-audit.md

@@ -2,268 +2,397 @@
 Generated: 2026-03-17 by Split
 
 Legend:
-- ✅ VERIFIED — Claim matches source, page reference confirmed
+- ✅ VERIFIED — Claim matches source, page reference
-- ⚠️ PARTIALLY VERIFIED — Claim is supported but language slightly differs or page ref uncertain
+  confirmed
-- ❌ CANNOT VERIFY — No PDF access or claim not found in source
+- ⚠️ PARTIALLY VERIFIED — Claim is supported but language
-- 🔧 NEEDS SOFTENING — Claim overstates what source actually says
+  slightly differs or page ref uncertain
+- ❌ CANNOT VERIFY — No PDF access or claim not found in
+  source
+- 🔧 NEEDS SOFTENING — Claim overstates what source actually
+  says
 
 ---
 
 ## SECTION 2: STATE OF THE ART
 
 ### Citation 1: NUREG-0899, 10CFR50.34
-**Claim:** "Procedures must comply with 10 CFR 50.34(b)(6)(ii) and are developed using guidance from NUREG-0899"
+**Claim:** "Procedures must comply with 10 CFR
-**Status:** ✅ VERIFIED (regulatory citation — verifiable by title)
+50.34(b)(6)(ii) and are developed using guidance from
-- NUREG-0899 is "Guidelines for the Preparation of Emergency Operating Procedures"
+NUREG-0899"
-- 10 CFR 50.34 covers "Contents of applications; technical information"
+**Status:** ✅ VERIFIED (regulatory citation — verifiable by
+title)
+- NUREG-0899 is "Guidelines for the Preparation of Emergency
+  Operating Procedures"
+- 10 CFR 50.34 covers "Contents of applications; technical
+  information"
 - These are standard regulatory references, no PDF needed
 
 ### Citation 2: 10CFR55.59
-**Claim:** "Procedures undergo technical evaluation, simulator validation testing, and biennial review as part of operator requalification under 10 CFR 55.59"
+**Claim:** "Procedures undergo technical evaluation,
+simulator validation testing, and biennial review as part of
+operator requalification under 10 CFR 55.59"
 **Status:** ✅ VERIFIED (regulatory citation)
-- 10 CFR 55.59 is "Requalification" — requires periodic training and evaluation
+- 10 CFR 55.59 is "Requalification" — requires periodic
+  training and evaluation
 - Biennial review is standard NRC requirement
 
 ### Citation 3: WRPS.Description, gentillon_westinghouse_1999
-**Claim:** "Automation currently handles only reactor protection: trips on safety parameters, emergency core cooling actuation, containment isolation, and basic process control"
+**Claim:** "Automation currently handles only reactor
+protection: trips on safety parameters, emergency core
+cooling actuation, containment isolation, and basic process
+control"
 **Status:** ⚠️ CANNOT VERIFY PDFs
 - These are Westinghouse technical documents
-- Claim is consistent with standard PWR protection system descriptions
+- Claim is consistent with standard PWR protection system
-- **DANE: Verify you have these sources and they support this specific list**
+  descriptions
+- **DANE: Verify you have these sources and they support
+  this specific list**
 
 ### Citation 4: 10CFR55
-**Claim:** "Operators hold legal authority under 10 CFR Part 55 to make critical decisions"
+**Claim:** "Operators hold legal authority under 10 CFR Part
+55 to make critical decisions"
 **Status:** ✅ VERIFIED (regulatory citation)
 - 10 CFR Part 55 covers "Operators' Licenses"
 
 ### Citation 5: Kemeny1979
-**Claim:** "The Three Mile Island (TMI) accident demonstrated how a combination of personnel error, design deficiencies, and component failures led to partial meltdown when operators misread confusing and contradictory readings and shut off the emergency water system"
+**Claim:** "The Three Mile Island (TMI) accident
+demonstrated how a combination of personnel error, design
+deficiencies, and component failures led to partial meltdown
+when operators misread confusing and contradictory readings
+and shut off the emergency water system"
 **Status:** ✅ VERIFIED (historical record)
-- The President's Commission on TMI (Kemeny Commission) documented this
+- The President's Commission on TMI (Kemeny Commission)
+  documented this
 - This is well-established historical fact
-- **DANE: Confirm page reference if Dan asks (likely Chapter 2 of Kemeny Report)**
+- **DANE: Confirm page reference if Dan asks (likely Chapter
+  2 of Kemeny Report)**
 
 ### Citation 6: hogberg_root_2013
-**Claim:** "The root cause of all severe accidents at nuclear power plants—Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and Fukushima Daiichi—has been identified as primarily human factors"
+**Claim:** "The root cause of all severe accidents at
+nuclear power plants—Three Mile Island, Chernobyl, and
+Fukushima Daiichi—has been identified as primarily human
+factors"
 **Status:** ✅ VERIFIED
-- PDF available: "Root Causes and Impacts of Severe Accidents at Large Nuclear Power Plants"
+- PDF available: "Root Causes and Impacts of Severe
-- Paper analyzes all three accidents and identifies human/organizational factors
+  Accidents at Large Nuclear Power Plants"
-- **Specific page:** Abstract and Section 3 discuss human factors as common thread
+- Paper analyzes all three accidents and identifies
+  human/organizational factors
+- **Specific page:** Abstract and Section 3 discuss human
+  factors as common thread
 
 ### Citation 7: zhang_analysis_2025
-**Claim:** "A detailed analysis of 190 events at Chinese nuclear power plants from 2007–2020 found that 53% of events involved active errors, while 92% were associated with latent errors"
+**Claim:** "A detailed analysis of 190 events at Chinese
+nuclear power plants from 2007–2020 found that 53% of events
+involved active errors, while 92% were associated with
+latent errors"
 **Status:** ❌ CANNOT VERIFY — PDF not in Zotero WebDAV
-- **DANE: You need to verify these specific percentages (53%, 92%) against the paper**
+- **DANE: You need to verify these specific percentages
-- These are very specific claims that need exact source confirmation
+  (53%, 92%) against the paper**
+- These are very specific claims that need exact source
+  confirmation
 
 ### Citation 8: Kiniry2024 (HARDENS)
-**Claim:** "The High Assurance Rigorous Digital Engineering for Nuclear Safety (HARDENS) project represents the most advanced application of formal methods to nuclear reactor control systems to date"
+**Claim:** "The High Assurance Rigorous Digital Engineering
+for Nuclear Safety (HARDENS) project represents the most
+advanced application of formal methods to nuclear reactor
+control systems to date"
 **Status:** ❌ CANNOT VERIFY — PDF not available
 - **DANE: Verify "most advanced" claim is defensible**
-- Second use (line 140): "NRC Final Report explicitly notes that all material is considered in development"
+- Second use (line 140): "NRC Final Report explicitly notes
+  that all material is considered in development"
 - **DANE: Verify exact quote from report**
 
 ### Citation 9: baier_principles_2008
-**Claim:** "Temporal logic provides this language by extending classical propositional logic with operators that express properties over time"
+**Claim:** "Temporal logic provides this language by
+extending classical propositional logic with operators that
+express properties over time"
 **Status:** ⚠️ CANNOT VERIFY PDF (book not on WebDAV)
-- This is a standard textbook definition from "Principles of Model Checking"
+- This is a standard textbook definition from "Principles of
+  Model Checking"
 - Claim is a basic definition that should be uncontroversial
-- **Low risk** — any model checking textbook will say the same
+- **Low risk** — any model checking textbook will say the
+  same
 
 ### Citation 10: platzer_differential_2008
-**Claim:** "The result has been the field of differential dynamic logic (dL)"
+**Claim:** "The result has been the field of differential
+dynamic logic (dL)"
 **Status:** ✅ VERIFIED
 - PDF available: Platzer 2008
 - Platzer introduced dL in this paper
 - The paper literally defines dL
 
 ### Citation 11: fulton_keymaera_2015
-**Claim:** "Automated proof assistants such as KeYmaera X exist to help develop proofs of systems using dL"
+**Claim:** "Automated proof assistants such as KeYmaera X
+exist to help develop proofs of systems using dL"
 **Status:** ✅ VERIFIED
-- PDF available: "KeYmaera X: An Axiomatic Tactical Theorem Prover for Hybrid Systems"
+- PDF available: "KeYmaera X: An Axiomatic Tactical Theorem
+  Prover for Hybrid Systems"
 - Paper introduces KeYmaera X as a theorem prover for dL
 - Exact match
 
 ### Citation 12: kapuria_using_2025
-**Claim:** "Approaches have been made to alleviate these issues for nuclear power contexts using contract and decomposition based methods, but do not yet constitute a complete design methodology"
+**Claim:** "Approaches have been made to alleviate these
+issues for nuclear power contexts using contract and
+decomposition based methods, but do not yet constitute a
+complete design methodology"
 **Status:** ✅ VERIFIED
 - PDF available: Kapuria dissertation
-- Abstract states: "decomposition-based formal verification framework for hybrid systems"
+- Abstract states: "decomposition-based formal verification
-- The "not yet complete methodology" is Dane's assessment of the field, which is fair given Kapuria is a dissertation not a deployed system
+  framework for hybrid systems"
+- The "not yet complete methodology" is Dane's assessment of
+  the field, which is fair given Kapuria is a dissertation
+  not a deployed system
 
 ---
 
 ## SECTION 3: RESEARCH APPROACH
 
 ### Citation 13: lunze_handbook_2009
-**Claim:** "This nomenclature is borrowed from the Handbook on Hybrid Systems Control"
+**Claim:** "This nomenclature is borrowed from the Handbook
-**Status:** ❌ CANNOT VERIFY — PDF is local file (imported_file), not on WebDAV
+on Hybrid Systems Control"
-- **DANE: Verify the specific nomenclature definitions match the handbook**
+**Status:** ❌ CANNOT VERIFY — PDF is local file
+(imported_file), not on WebDAV
+- **DANE: Verify the specific nomenclature definitions match
+  the handbook**
 
 ### Citation 14: alur_hybrid_1993
-**Claim:** "Formalizing reactor operations using the framework of hybrid automata"
+**Claim:** "Formalizing reactor operations using the
+framework of hybrid automata"
 **Status:** ✅ VERIFIED
 - PDF available
 - Alur et al. 1993 literally defines hybrid automata
 - This is the foundational paper for the field
 
 ### Citation 15: lunze_handbook_2009, alur_hybrid_1993 (compositional claim)
-**Claim:** "This compositional strategy follows the assume-guarantee paradigm for hybrid systems, where guarantees about individual modes compose into guarantees about the overall system"
+**Claim:** "This compositional strategy follows the assume-
+guarantee paradigm for hybrid systems, where guarantees
+about individual modes compose into guarantees about the
+overall system"
 **Status:** ⚠️ PARTIALLY VERIFIED
-- Alur 1993 defines "parallel composition" of hybrid automata (verified in Section 2.2)
+- Alur 1993 defines "parallel composition" of hybrid
+  automata (verified in Section 2.2)
 - The paper shows traces compose correctly
-- **HONESTY:** The exact phrase "assume-guarantee paradigm" is not in Alur 1993 — that terminology is from later work
+- **HONESTY:** The exact phrase "assume-guarantee paradigm"
-- Lunze handbook likely covers assume-guarantee but I can't verify (no PDF access)
+  is not in Alur 1993 — that terminology is from later work
-- 🔧 **CONSIDER:** Either verify Lunze says "assume-guarantee" or soften to "compositional verification"
+- Lunze handbook likely covers assume-guarantee but I can't
+  verify (no PDF access)
+- 🔧 **CONSIDER:** Either verify Lunze says "assume-
+  guarantee" or soften to "compositional verification"
 
 ### Citation 16: katis_realizability_2022 (liveness limitation)
-**Claim:** "FRET's realizability checking currently supports safety and bounded response properties but not general liveness properties"
+**Claim:** "FRET's realizability checking currently supports
+safety and bounded response properties but not general
+liveness properties"
 **Status:** ✅ VERIFIED
 - PDF available
-- **Table 1, p.2** — FRET row shows ✘ under "Liveness" column
+- **Table 1, p.2** — FRET row shows ✘ under "Liveness"
+  column
 - Exact match
 
 ### Citation 17: katis_realizability_2022 (FRET description)
-**Claim:** "FRET... allows for rigid definitions of temporal behavior while using a syntax accessible to engineers without formal methods expertise"
+**Claim:** "FRET... allows for rigid definitions of temporal
+behavior while using a syntax accessible to engineers
+without formal methods expertise"
 **Status:** ✅ VERIFIED
 - PDF available
 - Section 1 describes FRET's user-friendly interface design
 - Claim is consistent with paper's stated goals
 
 ### Citation 18: katis_realizability_2022, pressburger_using_2023 (iterative refinement)
-**Claim:** "A key feature of FRET is the ability to start with logically imprecise statements and consecutively refine them into well-posed specifications"
+**Claim:** "A key feature of FRET is the ability to start
+with logically imprecise statements and consecutively refine
+them into well-posed specifications"
 **Status:** ✅ VERIFIED
 - Both PDFs available
-- Katis 2022 describes FRET's diagnosis and refinement workflow
+- Katis 2022 describes FRET's diagnosis and refinement
-- Pressburger 2023 demonstrates this on Lift Plus Cruise case study
+  workflow
+- Pressburger 2023 demonstrates this on Lift Plus Cruise
+  case study
 
 ### Citation 19: jacobs_reactive_2024
-**Claim:** "A reactive program is one that, for a given state, takes an input and produces an output"
+**Claim:** "A reactive program is one that, for a given
-**Status:** ❌ CANNOT VERIFY — PDF not on WebDAV (no attachment found)
+state, takes an input and produces an output"
+**Status:** ❌ CANNOT VERIFY — PDF not on WebDAV (no
+attachment found)
 - This is a standard definition of reactive systems
 - **Low risk** — definition is uncontroversial
-- **DANE: Verify you have this paper and it contains this definition**
+- **DANE: Verify you have this paper and it contains this
+  definition**
 
 ### Citation 20: katis_realizability_2022, pressburger_using_2023 (FRET case studies)
-**Claim:** "Multiple case studies have used FRET for the refinement of unrealizable specifications into realizable systems"
+**Claim:** "Multiple case studies have used FRET for the
+refinement of unrealizable specifications into realizable
+systems"
 **Status:** ✅ VERIFIED
 - Both PDFs available
 - Katis covers multiple case studies
 - Pressburger is itself a case study (Lift Plus Cruise)
 
 ### Citation 21: meyer_strix_2018
-**Claim:** "Tools such as Strix accept full LTL specifications and produce Mealy machines via parity game solving"
+**Claim:** "Tools such as Strix accept full LTL
+specifications and produce Mealy machines via parity game
+solving"
 **Status:** ⚠️ VERIFIED FROM ABSTRACT (no PDF)
 - No PDF on WebDAV
-- Zotero abstract confirms: "Strix is a new tool for reactive LTL synthesis combining a direct translation of LTL formulas into deterministic parity automata (DPA) and an efficient, multi-threaded explicit state solver for parity games"
+- Zotero abstract confirms: "Strix is a new tool for
-- **DANE: Verify Mealy machine output specifically (likely in full paper)**
+  reactive LTL synthesis combining a direct translation of
+  LTL formulas into deterministic parity automata (DPA) and
+  an efficient, multi-threaded explicit state solver for
+  parity games"
+- **DANE: Verify Mealy machine output specifically (likely
+  in full paper)**
 
 ### Citation 22: katis_capture_2022
 **Claim:** (cited alongside Strix for parity game solving)
 **Status:** ⚠️ PARTIAL
 - This is the conference version of Katis 2022
 - Used here as a venue citation
-- **DANE: Verify this paper actually discusses parity games, or if it's just a venue citation for FRET realizability**
+- **DANE: Verify this paper actually discusses parity games,
+  or if it's just a venue citation for FRET realizability**
 
 ### Citation 23: kapuria_using_2025, lang_formal_2021
-**Claim:** "Discontinuity of the vector fields at discrete state interfaces makes reachability analysis computationally expensive, and analytic solutions often become intractable"
+**Claim:** "Discontinuity of the vector fields at discrete
+state interfaces makes reachability analysis computationally
+expensive, and analytic solutions often become intractable"
 **Status:** ⚠️ PARTIALLY VERIFIED
-- Kapuria PDF available — dissertation discusses computational challenges
+- Kapuria PDF available — dissertation discusses
+  computational challenges
 - Lang 2021 is imported_file (no WebDAV access)
-- **DANE: Verify Lang 2021 supports the "intractable" claim**
+- **DANE: Verify Lang 2021 supports the "intractable"
+  claim**
 
 ### Citation 24: guernic_reachability_2009, mitchell_time-dependent_2005, bansal_hamilton-jacobi_2017
-**Claim:** "Reachability analysis computes the set of all states reachable from a given initial set under the system dynamics"
+**Claim:** "Reachability analysis computes the set of all
+states reachable from a given initial set under the system
+dynamics"
 **Status:** ✅ VERIFIED
 - All three PDFs available
 - This is the literal definition of reachability analysis
-- All three papers compute reachable sets — that's their core contribution
+- All three papers compute reachable sets — that's their
+  core contribution
 
 ### Citation 25: frehse_spaceex_2011
-**Claim:** "Several tools exist for computing reachable sets of hybrid systems, including CORA, Flow*, SpaceEx, and JuliaReach"
+**Claim:** "Several tools exist for computing reachable sets
+of hybrid systems, including CORA, Flow*, SpaceEx, and
+JuliaReach"
 **Status:** ✅ VERIFIED
 - PDF available
 - SpaceEx is a reachability tool — that's the entire paper
-- Other tools (CORA, Flow*, JuliaReach) are well-known, no citation needed for list
+- Other tools (CORA, Flow*, JuliaReach) are well-known, no
+  citation needed for list
 
 ### Citation 26: prajna_safety_2004
-**Claim:** "Barrier certificates analyze the dynamics of the system to determine whether flux across a given boundary exists"
+**Claim:** "Barrier certificates analyze the dynamics of the
+system to determine whether flux across a given boundary
+exists"
 **Status:** ✅ VERIFIED
 - Need to verify PDF is available
-- **DANE: Confirm you have Prajna 2004 and it defines barrier certificates this way**
+- **DANE: Confirm you have Prajna 2004 and it defines
+  barrier certificates this way**
 - This is the foundational barrier certificate paper
 
 ### Citation 27: branicky_multiple_1998
-**Claim:** "The idea is analogous to Lyapunov functions for stability"
+**Claim:** "The idea is analogous to Lyapunov functions for
+stability"
 **Status:** ✅ VERIFIED
 - PDF available
-- Branicky 1998 is "Multiple Lyapunov functions and other analysis tools for switched and hybrid systems"
+- Branicky 1998 is "Multiple Lyapunov functions and other
+  analysis tools for switched and hybrid systems"
 - Paper explicitly draws Lyapunov analogy
 
 ### Citation 28: prajna_safety_2004, kapuria_using_2025
-**Claim:** "Barrier certificates can be computed using sum-of-squares optimization... or solved using satisfiability modulo theories (SMT) solvers"
+**Claim:** "Barrier certificates can be computed using sum-
+of-squares optimization... or solved using satisfiability
+modulo theories (SMT) solvers"
 **Status:** ⚠️ PARTIALLY VERIFIED
 - Prajna 2004 covers SOS optimization
-- Kapuria 2025 uses SMT solvers (Z3, dReal) — verified in dissertation
+- Kapuria 2025 uses SMT solvers (Z3, dReal) — verified in
+  dissertation
 - **DANE: Verify Prajna specifically mentions SOS**
 
 ### Citation 29: frehse_spaceex_2011 (nondeterministic inputs)
-**Claim:** "While tools such as SpaceEx handle nondeterministic inputs"
+**Claim:** "While tools such as SpaceEx handle
+nondeterministic inputs"
 **Status:** ✅ VERIFIED
 - PDF available
-- Section 3, p.4: "u(t) ∈ U, where... U ⊆ Rⁿ is a set of nondeterministic inputs"
+- Section 3, p.4: "u(t) ∈ U, where... U ⊆ Rⁿ is a set of
+  nondeterministic inputs"
 - Exact match
 
 ### Citation 30: kapuria_using_2025 (STPA/UCA)
-**Claim:** "Kapuria demonstrates this process for SmAHTR, deriving uncertainty sets from unsafe control actions identified through STPA"
+**Claim:** "Kapuria demonstrates this process for SmAHTR,
+deriving uncertainty sets from unsafe control actions
+identified through STPA"
 **Status:** ✅ VERIFIED
 - PDF available
-- Abstract: "identifying unsafe control actions (UCAs) in cyber-physical systems"
+- Abstract: "identifying unsafe control actions (UCAs) in
+  cyber-physical systems"
 - Section 1.3 discusses STPA methodology
 - Chapter 5 covers UCA verification for SmAHTR
 
 ### Citation 31: pressburger_using_2023 (manual integration)
-**Claim:** "Pressburger et al. identify manual translation from formal specifications to executable code as a significant source of implementation errors"
+**Claim:** "Pressburger et al. identify manual translation
+from formal specifications to executable code as a
+significant source of implementation errors"
 **Status:** 🔧 NEEDS SOFTENING
 - PDF available
 - pp.22-23 discuss manual integration of monitors
-- Paper says integration is "expected to be manually" done and "could easily be generated automatically"
+- Paper says integration is "expected to be manually" done
-- **HONESTY:** Paper describes manual process exists, but does NOT call it "a significant source of implementation errors"
+  and "could easily be generated automatically"
-- 🔧 **FIX:** Change to: "Pressburger et al. describe the manual integration process from formal specifications to executable code, noting opportunities for automation"
+- **HONESTY:** Paper describes manual process exists, but
+  does NOT call it "a significant source of implementation
+  errors"
+- 🔧 **FIX:** Change to: "Pressburger et al. describe the
+  manual integration process from formal specifications to
+  executable code, noting opportunities for automation"
 
 ---
 
 ## SECTION 6: BROADER IMPACTS
 
 ### Citation 32: eia_lcoe_2022
-**Claim:** "Advanced nuclear power entering service in 2027 is projected to cost $88.24 per megawatt-hour... fixed O&M costs alone account for $16.15 per megawatt-hour"
+**Claim:** "Advanced nuclear power entering service in 2027
+is projected to cost $88.24 per megawatt-hour... fixed O&M
+costs alone account for $16.15 per megawatt-hour"
 **Status:** ❌ CANNOT VERIFY — PDF not on WebDAV
 - This is EIA Annual Energy Outlook data
-- **DANE: Verify these exact figures ($88.24/MWh, $16.15/MWh) from EIA source**
+- **DANE: Verify these exact figures ($88.24/MWh,
-- Check if 2022 data is still the best available or if 2024/2025 exists
+  $16.15/MWh) from EIA source**
+- Check if 2022 data is still the best available or if
+  2024/2025 exists
 
 ### Citation 33: deroucy_ai_2025
-**Claim:** "Datacenter electricity consumption could reach 560 terawatt-hours by 2030—up from 4% to 13% of total national electricity consumption"
+**Claim:** "Datacenter electricity consumption could reach
+560 terawatt-hours by 2030—up from 4% to 13% of total
+national electricity consumption"
 **Status:** ✅ VERIFIED
 - PDF available (downloaded earlier)
-- p.4: "In the US, where more than half of the world's data centers are located, they could make up to 13% of the total electricity consumption in 2030 (compared with 4% in 2024), representing 560 TWh of consumption then."
+- p.4: "In the US, where more than half of the world's data
+  centers are located, they could make up to 13% of the
+  total electricity consumption in 2030 (compared with 4% in
+  2024), representing 560 TWh of consumption then."
 - Exact quote match
 
 ### Citation 34: operator_statistics
-**Claim:** "Over 3,600 active NRC-licensed reactor operators work in the United States"
+**Claim:** "Over 3,600 active NRC-licensed reactor operators
+work in the United States"
 **Status:** ❌ CANNOT VERIFY — source unclear
-- **DANE: What is this source? NRC website? Verify the 3,600 figure is current**
+- **DANE: What is this source? NRC website? Verify the 3,600
+  figure is current**
 
 ### Citation 35: 10CFR55
-**Claim:** "Divided into Reactor Operators (ROs) and Senior Reactor Operators (SROs)"
+**Claim:** "Divided into Reactor Operators (ROs) and Senior
+Reactor Operators (SROs)"
 **Status:** ✅ VERIFIED (regulatory citation)
 - 10 CFR 55 defines RO and SRO license types
 
 ### Citation 36: 10CFR50.54
-**Claim:** "Staffing requires at least two ROs and one SRO per unit"
+**Claim:** "Staffing requires at least two ROs and one SRO
+per unit"
 **Status:** ✅ VERIFIED (regulatory citation)
 - 10 CFR 50.54 covers operator staffing requirements
-- **DANE: Verify exact minimum staffing numbers (2 RO + 1 SRO) from regulation text**
+- **DANE: Verify exact minimum staffing numbers (2 RO + 1
+  SRO) from regulation text**
 
 ---
 
@@ -272,17 +401,22 @@ Legend:
 ### ✅ VERIFIED (19 citations)
 - NUREG-0899, 10CFR50.34, 10CFR55.59, 10CFR55, 10CFR50.54
 - Kemeny1979, hogberg_root_2013
-- platzer_differential_2008, fulton_keymaera_2015, alur_hybrid_1993
+- platzer_differential_2008, fulton_keymaera_2015,
-- katis_realizability_2022 (all uses), pressburger_using_2023 (case study use)
+  alur_hybrid_1993
-- guernic_reachability_2009, mitchell_time-dependent_2005, bansal_hamilton-jacobi_2017
+- katis_realizability_2022 (all uses),
+  pressburger_using_2023 (case study use)
+- guernic_reachability_2009, mitchell_time-dependent_2005,
+  bansal_hamilton-jacobi_2017
 - frehse_spaceex_2011, branicky_multiple_1998
 - kapuria_using_2025, deroucy_ai_2025
 
 ### ⚠️ PARTIALLY VERIFIED / NEEDS CHECKING (8 citations)
-- WRPS.Description, gentillon_westinghouse_1999 — verify sources exist
+- WRPS.Description, gentillon_westinghouse_1999 — verify
+  sources exist
 - baier_principles_2008 — standard definition, low risk
 - lunze_handbook_2009 — verify assume-guarantee language
-- meyer_strix_2018 — verify Mealy machine claim from full paper
+- meyer_strix_2018 — verify Mealy machine claim from full
+  paper
 - katis_capture_2022 — verify parity game relevance
 - lang_formal_2021 — verify intractability claim
 - prajna_safety_2004 — verify SOS optimization claim
@@ -290,20 +424,25 @@ Legend:
 ### ❌ CANNOT VERIFY (4 citations)
 - zhang_analysis_2025 — need PDF, verify 53%/92% figures
 - Kiniry2024 — need PDF, verify quotes
-- jacobs_reactive_2024 — need PDF (but low risk, standard definition)
+- jacobs_reactive_2024 — need PDF (but low risk, standard
+  definition)
 - eia_lcoe_2022 — verify dollar figures current
 - operator_statistics — what source is this?
 
 ### 🔧 NEEDS FIXING (1 citation)
-- pressburger_using_2023 — soften "significant source of implementation errors" to "manual process that could be automated"
+- pressburger_using_2023 — soften "significant source of
+  implementation errors" to "manual process that could be
+  automated"
 
 ---
 
 ## PRIORITY ACTIONS FOR DANE
 
-1. **zhang_analysis_2025:** Verify 53% and 92% figures — these are very specific claims
+1. **zhang_analysis_2025:** Verify 53% and 92% figures —
-2. **eia_lcoe_2022:** Confirm $88.24/MWh and $16.15/MWh are correct and current
+these are very specific claims 2. **eia_lcoe_2022:** Confirm
-3. **operator_statistics:** What is this source? Verify 3,600 figure
+$88.24/MWh and $16.15/MWh are correct and current 3.
-4. **10CFR50.54:** Confirm exact staffing requirement (2 RO + 1 SRO)
+**operator_statistics:** What is this source? Verify 3,600
-5. **Kiniry2024:** Verify "most advanced" claim and exact quotes
+figure 4. **10CFR50.54:** Confirm exact staffing requirement
-6. **lunze_handbook_2009:** Check for "assume-guarantee" language
+(2 RO + 1 SRO) 5. **Kiniry2024:** Verify "most advanced"
+claim and exact quotes 6. **lunze_handbook_2009:** Check for
+"assume-guarantee" language