fbbaebff9f
Full toolchain port. Numerical equivalence verified against MATLAB:
- main_mode_sweep.jl: every mode's final state matches MATLAB to 3-4 dp
- reach_operation.jl: per-halfspace margins match MATLAB exactly
- barrier_lyapunov.jl: per-halfspace bounds match (best Qbar from sweep
yields max|dT_c| = 33.228 K either side)
- barrier_compare_OL_CL.jl: OL gamma 1.038e13, CL gamma 1.848e4
matching the MATLAB result; LQR helps by ~20,000x on every halfspace.
Phase summary:
Phase 1: pke_solver.jl, plot_pke_results.jl (Plots.jl), main_mode_sweep.jl
Phase 2: reach_linear.jl, reach_operation.jl, barrier_lyapunov.jl,
barrier_compare_OL_CL.jl, load_predicates.jl
Phase 3 (this commit): delete plant-model/ entirely, delete reach
code from reachability/ keeping predicates.json + docs,
git mv julia-port/ -> code/, update root README + CLAUDE,
write code/CLAUDE.md and code/README.md, update reach
README + WALKTHROUGH file paths, journal preamble note
that pre-port entries reference MATLAB paths.
Why now: prompt-neutron stiffness in nonlinear reach made it clear we
need TMJets, which is Julia. Already had the Julia plant model
working and matching MATLAB. Two languages = two sources of truth =
two places to drift. One language, one truth.
Manifest.toml gitignored. .mat results gitignored.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
16 lines
528 B
TOML
16 lines
528 B
TOML
authors = ["Dane Sabo <yourstruly@danesabo.com>"]
|
|
|
|
[deps]
|
|
JSON = "682c06a0-de6a-54ab-a142-c8b1cf79cde6"
|
|
LazySets = "b4f0291d-fe17-52bc-9479-3d1a343d9043"
|
|
LinearAlgebra = "37e2e46d-f89d-539d-b4ee-838fcccc9c8e"
|
|
MAT = "23992714-dd62-5051-b70f-ba57cb901cac"
|
|
MatrixEquations = "99c1a7ee-ab34-5fd5-8076-27c950a045f4"
|
|
OrdinaryDiffEq = "1dea7af3-3e70-54e6-95c3-0bf5283fa5ed"
|
|
Plots = "91a5bcdd-55d7-5caf-9e0b-520d859cae80"
|
|
ReachabilityAnalysis = "1e97bd63-91d1-579d-8e8d-501d2b57c93f"
|
|
|
|
[compat]
|
|
OrdinaryDiffEq = "6.111.0"
|
|
julia = "1.10"
|