Obsidian/Presentations/ERLM/sections/16_conclusion.tex
Dane Sabo 2497bb4aa5 Auto sync: 2025-11-12 15:59:19 (110 files changed)
M  .task/backlog.data

M  .task/completed.data

M  .task/pending.data

M  .task/undo.data

A  PLAN_OF_STUDY_111225.pdf

R  Writing/202510270-Emerson-Pres/SaboOneSlide.pdf -> Presentations/202510270-Emerson-Pres/SaboOneSlide.pdf

R  Writing/202510270-Emerson-Pres/beamerthemedane.sty -> Presentations/202510270-Emerson-Pres/beamerthemedane.sty

R  Writing/202510270-Emerson-Pres/beamerthemedane_native.sty -> Presentations/202510270-Emerson-Pres/beamerthemedane_native.sty
2025-11-12 15:59:19 -05:00

89 lines
2.7 KiB
TeX

% Conclusion
\begin{frame}{Formally verified autonomous hybrid control: necessary, achievable, timely}
\begin{center}
\Large \textbf{Three Converging Imperatives}
\end{center}
\vspace{0.3cm}
\begin{center}
\begin{tikzpicture}
\draw[thick, fill=gray!20] (0,0) rectangle (12,4);
\node[align=center, text width=10cm] at (6,2) {
\textbf{FIGURE: Convergence Diagram}\\[0.2cm]
Three arrows pointing to center:\\[0.1cm]
1. Economic: \$21--28B annual O\&M\\
2. Safety: 70--80\% human error\\
3. Technical: Tools now exist\\[0.2cm]
Center: ``NOW is the time''
};
\end{tikzpicture}
\end{center}
\vspace{0.5cm}
\begin{center}
\begin{tikzpicture}[node distance=1.2cm, scale=0.85, transform shape]
\node[align=center] (h) {HARDENS\\(Discrete)};
\node[right=of h] (plus) {+};
\node[right=of plus, align=center] (c) {Continuous\\Verification};
\node[right=of c] (eq) {=};
\node[right=of eq, align=center, text=blue, font=\bfseries] (res) {Complete\\Hybrid System};
\draw[->, >=stealth, very thick] (h) -- (plus);
\draw[->, >=stealth, very thick] (plus) -- (c);
\draw[->, >=stealth, very thick] (c) -- (eq);
\draw[->, >=stealth, very thick] (eq) -- (res);
\end{tikzpicture}
\end{center}
%SPEAKER NOTES: See comments below
%
\textbf{Three Converging Imperatives:}
1. Economic: SMRs need autonomy to be viable
\$21--28B annual O\&M for datacenter demand alone
Per-megawatt staffing costs threaten SMR economics
2. Safety: Human error causes 70--80\% of incidents
Training can't overcome fundamental cognitive limits
Error probability: 0.001 → 1.0 under accident conditions
3. Technical: Tools now exist to verify hybrid systems
HARDENS proved discrete verification is feasible
Control theory provides continuous verification tools
We can now bridge the gap
\textbf{This Research Closes the Gap:}
HARDENS (Discrete) + Continuous Verification = Complete Hybrid System
\textbf{Vision:} Control engineers generate high-assurance autonomous controllers from procedures.
No formal methods PhD required. Mathematical proof included. Deployable on existing industrial hardware.
% (End of speaker notes)
\end{frame}
% Final slide
\begin{frame}{}
\begin{center}
\Huge \textbf{Questions?}
\vspace{1cm}
\Large Formally Verified Autonomous Hybrid Control
\vspace{0.5cm}
\normalsize
Dane A. Sabo\\
\texttt{dane.sabo@pitt.edu}\\[0.3cm]
Dr. Dan G. Cole\\
\texttt{dgcole@pitt.edu}
\vspace{0.5cm}
University of Pittsburgh\\
Cyber Energy Center
\end{center}
\end{frame}