Dane Sabo
2497bb4aa5
M .task/backlog.data M .task/completed.data M .task/pending.data M .task/undo.data A PLAN_OF_STUDY_111225.pdf R Writing/202510270-Emerson-Pres/SaboOneSlide.pdf -> Presentations/202510270-Emerson-Pres/SaboOneSlide.pdf R Writing/202510270-Emerson-Pres/beamerthemedane.sty -> Presentations/202510270-Emerson-Pres/beamerthemedane.sty R Writing/202510270-Emerson-Pres/beamerthemedane_native.sty -> Presentations/202510270-Emerson-Pres/beamerthemedane_native.sty
38 lines
1.6 KiB
TeX
38 lines
1.6 KiB
TeX
% The Paradox
|
|
\begin{frame}{Nuclear control faces a fundamental tension}
|
|
|
|
\begin{center}
|
|
\begin{tikzpicture}
|
|
\draw[thick, fill=gray!20] (0,0) rectangle (12,7);
|
|
\node[align=center, text width=10cm] at (6,3.5) {
|
|
\textbf{FIGURE: The Human Paradox}\\[0.3cm]
|
|
Split diagram:\\[0.2cm]
|
|
LEFT side (green): Why we need humans\\
|
|
(judgment, flexibility, novel situations)\\[0.2cm]
|
|
RIGHT side (red): Why humans fail\\
|
|
(7±2 memory, seconds vs ms, biases, stress)\\[0.3cm]
|
|
Bottom: Current division of labor\\
|
|
Automated = Terminal ops | Manual = Routine ops\\[0.2cm]
|
|
Arrow pointing to gap: \textbf{This is backwards!}
|
|
};
|
|
\end{tikzpicture}
|
|
\end{center}
|
|
|
|
%SPEAKER NOTES: See comments below
|
|
%
|
|
\textbf{The Paradox:} Human operators are both essential for flexibility and the primary source of failure
|
|
|
|
\textbf{Why We Need Humans:}
|
|
Strategic decision-making, procedure interpretation, handling novel situations, adaptive judgment, legal authority (10 CFR 55)
|
|
|
|
\textbf{Why Humans Fail:}
|
|
Working memory: 7±2 items, response time: seconds vs milliseconds, cognitive biases (confirmation, anchoring), stress degrades performance 10-50x, error rates: 0.001 → 1.0 under accident conditions
|
|
|
|
\textbf{Current Division:}
|
|
Automated = Emergency protection (trip systems, ECCS) --- terminal operations;
|
|
Manual = Strategic operations (startup, mode transitions, power changes) --- routine operations
|
|
|
|
\textbf{Goal:} Reliability of automation with sophistication of human decision-making
|
|
% (End of speaker notes)
|
|
\end{frame}
|