M .task/backlog.data M .task/completed.data M .task/pending.data M .task/undo.data A PLAN_OF_STUDY_111225.pdf R Writing/202510270-Emerson-Pres/SaboOneSlide.pdf -> Presentations/202510270-Emerson-Pres/SaboOneSlide.pdf R Writing/202510270-Emerson-Pres/beamerthemedane.sty -> Presentations/202510270-Emerson-Pres/beamerthemedane.sty R Writing/202510270-Emerson-Pres/beamerthemedane_native.sty -> Presentations/202510270-Emerson-Pres/beamerthemedane_native.sty
33 lines
1.1 KiB
TeX
33 lines
1.1 KiB
TeX
% Economic Challenge
|
|
\begin{frame}{Small modular reactors face an unsustainable staffing cost problem}
|
|
|
|
\begin{center}
|
|
\begin{tikzpicture}
|
|
\draw[thick, fill=gray!20] (0,0) rectangle (12,6);
|
|
\node[align=center, text width=10cm] at (6,3) {
|
|
\textbf{FIGURE: Staffing Cost Comparison}\\[0.3cm]
|
|
Bar chart showing:\\
|
|
- Conventional reactor: lower \$/MW staffing\\
|
|
- SMR: higher \$/MW staffing\\[0.3cm]
|
|
Highlight: Same overhead, less output\\
|
|
\$21--28B annual market opportunity
|
|
};
|
|
\end{tikzpicture}
|
|
\end{center}
|
|
|
|
\end{frame}
|
|
|
|
% SPEAKER NOTES:
|
|
% The Economic Reality:
|
|
% - Current requirement: 2+ ROs + 1+ SRO per unit
|
|
% - Training: up to 6 years
|
|
% - SMRs have same overhead but lower output
|
|
% - Result: Higher $/MW O&M costs threaten viability
|
|
%
|
|
% The Market Opportunity:
|
|
% - Datacenter demand: 1,050 TWh annually by 2030
|
|
% - Nuclear O&M: 23-30% of levelized cost ($88.24/MWh)
|
|
% - Annual O&M for datacenter demand alone: $21-28 billion
|
|
%
|
|
% Key message: Automation is not optional---it's economically essential
|