Dane Sabo 1f3afde500 Auto sync: 2025-12-13 22:34:13 (108 files changed)
A  .DS_Store

A  Presentations/.DS_Store

A  Presentations/20251215-Emerson-Pres/.DS_Store

A  Presentations/20251215-Emerson-Pres/ERLM_SABO_DRAFT_PRES.pdf

A  Presentations/20251215-Emerson-Pres/ERLM_SABO_FINAL_PRES.pdf

A  Presentations/20251215-Emerson-Pres/actual-presentation-outline.md

A  Presentations/20251215-Emerson-Pres/bouncing_ball_hybrid.py

A  Presentations/20251215-Emerson-Pres/images/.DS_Store
2025-12-13 22:34:13 -05:00

33 lines
1.1 KiB
TeX

% Economic Challenge
\begin{frame}{Small modular reactors face an unsustainable staffing cost problem}
\begin{center}
\begin{tikzpicture}
\draw[thick, fill=gray!20] (0,0) rectangle (12,6);
\node[align=center, text width=10cm] at (6,3) {
\textbf{FIGURE: Staffing Cost Comparison}\\[0.3cm]
Bar chart showing:\\
- Conventional reactor: lower \$/MW staffing\\
- SMR: higher \$/MW staffing\\[0.3cm]
Highlight: Same overhead, less output\\
\$21--28B annual market opportunity
};
\end{tikzpicture}
\end{center}
\end{frame}
% SPEAKER NOTES:
% The Economic Reality:
% - Current requirement: 2+ ROs + 1+ SRO per unit
% - Training: up to 6 years
% - SMRs have same overhead but lower output
% - Result: Higher $/MW O&M costs threaten viability
%
% The Market Opportunity:
% - Datacenter demand: 1,050 TWh annually by 2030
% - Nuclear O&M: 23-30% of levelized cost ($88.24/MWh)
% - Annual O&M for datacenter demand alone: $21-28 billion
%
% Key message: Automation is not optional---it's economically essential