Dane Sabo dfca8eab77 Auto sync: 2025-12-09 17:19:30 (20 files changed)
M  .task/backlog.data

M  .task/completed.data

M  .task/pending.data

M  .task/undo.data

A  Class_Work/nuce2101/final/latex/SABO_NUCE2101_FINAL.pdf

M  Class_Work/nuce2101/final/latex/main.aux

M  Class_Work/nuce2101/final/latex/main.fdb_latexmk

M  Class_Work/nuce2101/final/latex/main.fls
2025-12-09 17:19:30 -05:00

100 lines
3.6 KiB
TeX

\section*{Problem 7}
\subsection*{Part A}
Starting with the point kinetics equations with one delayed precursor group, using
the prompt jump approximation where prompt neutrons reach equilibrium instantly:
\[\frac{dN(t)}{dt} = \lambda C(t)\]
\[\frac{dC(t)}{dt} = \frac{\beta}{\Lambda}N(t) - \lambda C(t)\]
Using appropriate numerical values for a PWR with low enrichment U-235 fuel:
\begin{itemize}
\item \(\beta = 0.0065\) (650 pcm)
\item \(\Lambda = 5 \times 10^{-5}\) s (50 \(\mu\)s)
\item \(\lambda = 0.08\) s\(^{-1}\)
\item \(\rho = +0.0005\) (+50 pcm inserted)
\end{itemize}
The complete system of equations describing reactor power as a function of time is:
\[N(t) = \Lambda \frac{\lambda C(t)}{\beta -\rho} \]
\[\frac{dC(t)}{dt} = \frac{\beta}{\Lambda}N(t) - \lambda C(t)\]
Substituting N(t) into the precursor equation:
\[\frac{dC(t)}{dt} = \frac{\beta \lambda}{\beta -\rho} C(t) - \lambda C(t) = \lambda C(t) \left(\frac{\beta}{\beta - \rho} - 1\right)\]
Simplifying:
\[\frac{dC(t)}{dt} = \lambda C(t) \frac{\rho}{\beta - \rho}\]
With the given numerical values (\(\beta = 0.0065\), \(\rho = 0.0005\), \(\lambda = 0.08\) s\(^{-1}\), \(\Lambda = 5 \times 10^{-5}\) s):
\[\frac{dC(t)}{dt} = 0.08 \times C(t) \times \frac{0.0005}{0.006} = 6.67 \times 10^{-3} C(t)\]
\[N(t) = 5 \times 10^{-5} \times \frac{0.08 \times C(t)}{0.006} = 6.67 \times 10^{-4} C(t)\]
\subsection*{Part B}
The kinetics parameters chosen are justified as follows:
\begin{itemize}
\item \(\beta = 0.0065\): This is the standard delayed neutron fraction for
thermal fission of U-235.
\item \(\Lambda = 50 \mu\)s: This is the typical prompt neutron generation
time for a pressurized water reactor.
\item \(\lambda = 0.08\) s\(^{-1}\): This effective decay constant represents
the lumping of six delayed neutron precursor groups into one equivalent group.
This gives an effective half-life of \(t_{1/2} = \ln(2)/\lambda \approx 8.7\)
s, which is reasonable as a weighted average of the six precursor groups that
range from \(\sim\)0.2 s to \(\sim\)80 s half-lives.
\end{itemize}
\subsection*{Part C}
Power will stop increasing when \(\frac{dN}{dt} = 0\), which occurs when
temperature feedback effects add sufficient negative reactivity to cancel the
+50 pcm reactivity insertion.
The reactor reaches a new equilibrium when:
\[\rho_{net} = \rho_{inserted} + \alpha_f \Delta T_f + \alpha_m \Delta T_m = 0\]
For \(\rho_{inserted} = +50\) pcm, temperature feedback must provide
\(-50\) pcm.
\subsection*{Part D}
At end of life (EOL) with +200 pcm reactivity insertion, several key parameters
change:
\begin{itemize}
\item \(\beta_{EOL} \approx 0.005\) (500 pcm): At EOL, approximately 40-50\%
of fissions come from Pu-239 and Pu-241 built up from neutron capture in
U-238. Since Pu-239 has \(\beta \approx 0.0021\) (much lower than U-235's
0.0065), the effective \(\beta\) is a weighted average that decreases to
around 0.005.
\end{itemize}
The time constant for the transient becomes:
\[\tau_{EOL} = \frac{\beta - \rho}{\lambda \rho} = \frac{0.0045 - 0.002}{0.08 \times 0.002} = 15.6 \text{ s}\]
compared to BOL:
\[\tau_{BOL} = \frac{0.0065 - 0.0005}{0.08 \times 0.0005} = 150 \text{ s}\]
The EOL transient is much faster (10x shorter period) because \(\beta - \rho\)
is smaller relative to \(\rho\).
The spent core actually experiences a more dramatic transient per unit
reactivity insertion, but the stronger feedback from increased fuel temperature
effects provides self-limiting behavior that prevents excessive power excursion.
Plutonium-240 absorbs a lot of neutrons as 240Pu concentration builds up.