% Innovation Summary
\begin{frame}{The innovation is systematic integration to bridge a fundamental gap}

  \begin{center}
    \begin{tikzpicture}
      \draw[thick, fill=gray!20] (0,0) rectangle (12,3.5);
      \node[align=center, text width=10cm] at (6,1.75) {
        \textbf{FIGURE: Innovation Visualization}\\[0.2cm]
        Show existing tools (FRET, Strix, reachability)\\
        as building blocks being assembled into\\
        integrated methodology\\[0.1cm]
        Highlight: Integration + Decomposition = Novel contribution
      };
    \end{tikzpicture}
  \end{center}

  \vspace{0.5cm}

  \begin{center}
    \small
    \begin{tabular}{lcc}
      \toprule
      & \textbf{HARDENS} & \textbf{This Work} \\
      \midrule
      Discrete verification & \checkmark & \checkmark \\
      Continuous verification & $\times$ & \checkmark \\
      Hybrid verification & $\times$ & \checkmark \\
      Hardware-in-loop & $\times$ & \checkmark \\
      \bottomrule
    \end{tabular}
  \end{center}

  %SPEAKER NOTES: See comments below
%
    \textbf{What's NOT New (but state-of-the-art):}
    Temporal logic, reactive synthesis, reachability analysis, barrier certificates, hardware-in-the-loop.
    These are mature techniques from computer science and control theory.

    \textbf{What IS New:}
    - Integration: Unifying discrete and continuous verification
    - Methodology: Systematic tool-supported workflow
    - Decomposition: Automaton-first design enables tractable verification
    - Practical: Targets existing industrial hardware

    \textbf{Comparison to HARDENS:}
    HARDENS: Discrete only, TRL 3-4, no hardware-in-loop
    This Work: Full hybrid system, TRL 5, hardware-in-loop

    \textbf{Key Enabling Insight:}
    Automaton-first design makes continuous verification tractable by decomposing the problem into local verifications with compositional guarantees
% (End of speaker notes)
\end{frame}