Compare commits
No commits in common. "e601adcd7c06e89eb63a3f89cb4e869a8559f7ae" and "addf537aa5e1ac5b50444d7e95761836c9d7fed3" have entirely different histories.
e601adcd7c
...
addf537aa5
@ -1,32 +1,6 @@
|
|||||||
t<!The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog. The dog takes a nice nap. :)>
|
<!The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog. The dog takes a nice nap. :)>
|
||||||
This is a general breakdown of how the conference went, what I learned, and
|
This is a general breakdown of how the conference went, what I learned, and
|
||||||
what my impressions were.
|
what my impressions were.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Day One
|
# Day One
|
||||||
## Keynote
|
##
|
||||||
Darren Cofer from Collins Aerospace gave a really good talk about AI and
|
|
||||||
how we can reason about it when it comes to high assurance systems. This is
|
|
||||||
the littlebird autonomous helicopter guy in Loonwerks. Buddy knows his shit.
|
|
||||||
Big takeaways were the following:
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
1. There's going to be demand for high assurance AI systems. We need software
|
|
||||||
that can generalize better than explicit rule based designs that we have now.
|
|
||||||
2. Approaches to high assurance AI straddle two ditches: one side being 'it's
|
|
||||||
just software' and 'it's impossible'. Neither are really true.
|
|
||||||
3. Bound behavior of probabilistic requirements seems like a good strategy
|
|
||||||
4. He started talking about AADL for run time assurance using assume
|
|
||||||
guarantee stuff
|
|
||||||
5. Idiocracy referenced
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Theorem Proving
|
|
||||||
1. What the fuck is a DAG?
|
|
||||||
- Turns out it's Directed Acyclic Graph
|
|
||||||
2. Some stuff from TLA+
|
|
||||||
3. Most of what I got is it was people building tools for problems in
|
|
||||||
software. No applications.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Verification
|
|
||||||
1. Didn't really get anything from the first two.
|
|
||||||
2.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user