.sessions/Journal.vim

@@ -1,89 +0,0 @@
-let SessionLoad = 1
-let s:so_save = &g:so | let s:siso_save = &g:siso | setg so=0 siso=0 | setl so=-1 siso=-1
-let v:this_session=expand("<sfile>:p")
-silent only
-silent tabonly
-cd ~/Documents/Dane\'s\ Vault/9999\ Personal/Journal
-if expand('%') == '' && !&modified && line('$') <= 1 && getline(1) == ''
-  let s:wipebuf = bufnr('%')
-endif
-let s:shortmess_save = &shortmess
-if &shortmess =~ 'A'
-  set shortmess=aoOA
-else
-  set shortmess=aoO
-endif
-badd +16 ~/Documents/Dane\'s\ Vault/5\ Thesis/4\ Meetings/DGC_DAS_328.md
-argglobal
-%argdel
-edit ~/Documents/Dane\'s\ Vault/5\ Thesis/4\ Meetings/DGC_DAS_328.md
-let s:save_splitbelow = &splitbelow
-let s:save_splitright = &splitright
-set splitbelow splitright
-wincmd _ | wincmd |
-vsplit
-1wincmd h
-wincmd w
-let &splitbelow = s:save_splitbelow
-let &splitright = s:save_splitright
-wincmd t
-let s:save_winminheight = &winminheight
-let s:save_winminwidth = &winminwidth
-set winminheight=0
-set winheight=1
-set winminwidth=0
-set winwidth=1
-exe 'vert 1resize ' . ((&columns * 30 + 95) / 190)
-exe 'vert 2resize ' . ((&columns * 159 + 95) / 190)
-argglobal
-enew
-file NvimTree_1
-balt ~/Documents/Dane\'s\ Vault/5\ Thesis/4\ Meetings/DGC_DAS_328.md
-setlocal fdm=manual
-setlocal fde=0
-setlocal fmr={{{,}}}
-setlocal fdi=#
-setlocal fdl=0
-setlocal fml=1
-setlocal fdn=20
-setlocal nofen
-wincmd w
-argglobal
-setlocal fdm=manual
-setlocal fde=0
-setlocal fmr={{{,}}}
-setlocal fdi=#
-setlocal fdl=0
-setlocal fml=1
-setlocal fdn=20
-setlocal fen
-silent! normal! zE
-let &fdl = &fdl
-let s:l = 16 - ((15 * winheight(0) + 30) / 60)
-if s:l < 1 | let s:l = 1 | endif
-keepjumps exe s:l
-normal! zt
-keepjumps 16
-normal! 080|
-wincmd w
-exe 'vert 1resize ' . ((&columns * 30 + 95) / 190)
-exe 'vert 2resize ' . ((&columns * 159 + 95) / 190)
-tabnext 1
-if exists('s:wipebuf') && len(win_findbuf(s:wipebuf)) == 0 && getbufvar(s:wipebuf, '&buftype') isnot# 'terminal'
-  silent exe 'bwipe ' . s:wipebuf
-endif
-unlet! s:wipebuf
-set winheight=1 winwidth=20
-let &shortmess = s:shortmess_save
-let &winminheight = s:save_winminheight
-let &winminwidth = s:save_winminwidth
-let s:sx = expand("<sfile>:p:r")."x.vim"
-if filereadable(s:sx)
-  exe "source " . fnameescape(s:sx)
-endif
-let &g:so = s:so_save | let &g:siso = s:siso_save
-set hlsearch
-nohlsearch
-doautoall SessionLoadPost
-unlet SessionLoad
-" vim: set ft=vim :

.sessions/Thesis_Notes.vim

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ let s:so_save = &g:so | let s:siso_save = &g:siso | setg so=0 siso=0 | setl so=-
 let v:this_session=expand("<sfile>:p")
 silent only
 silent tabonly
-cd ~/Documents/Dane\'s\ Vault/9999\ Personal/Journal
+cd ~/Documents/Dane\'s\ Vault/5\ Thesis
 if expand('%') == '' && !&modified && line('$') <= 1 && getline(1) == ''
   let s:wipebuf = bufnr('%')
 endif
@@ -13,10 +13,10 @@ if &shortmess =~ 'A'
 else
   set shortmess=aoO
 endif
-badd +16 ~/Documents/Dane\'s\ Vault/5\ Thesis/4\ Meetings/DGC_DAS_328.md
+badd +4 4\ Meetings/DGC_DAS_328.md
 argglobal
 %argdel
-edit ~/Documents/Dane\'s\ Vault/5\ Thesis/4\ Meetings/DGC_DAS_328.md
+edit 4\ Meetings/DGC_DAS_328.md
 argglobal
 setlocal fdm=manual
 setlocal fde=0
@@ -28,12 +28,12 @@ setlocal fdn=20
 setlocal fen
 silent! normal! zE
 let &fdl = &fdl
-let s:l = 16 - ((15 * winheight(0) + 30) / 60)
+let s:l = 4 - ((3 * winheight(0) + 5) / 11)
 if s:l < 1 | let s:l = 1 | endif
 keepjumps exe s:l
 normal! zt
-keepjumps 16
+keepjumps 4
-normal! 080|
+normal! 03|
 tabnext 1
 if exists('s:wipebuf') && len(win_findbuf(s:wipebuf)) == 0 && getbufvar(s:wipebuf, '&buftype') isnot# 'terminal'
   silent exe 'bwipe ' . s:wipebuf

5 Thesis/4 Meetings/DGC_DAS_328.md

@@ -1,22 +1,4 @@
 The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog. The dog stays blissfully asleep. :)
 
 # Things to discuss
-1. NRC Fellowship money update
+1. 
-    a) Does Pitt have the full grant right now or how is that money moving?
-    b) Is it possible that the NRC pulls the plug on the fellowship and leaves
-    Pitt / me holding the bag?
-
-2. HARDENS / NRC Stuff
-    a) You mentioned HARDENS was coming back up. What?
-    b) Had an idea about linguistics kinds translating 
-
-3. SAR ADC idea
-    a) What's happening with digital control theory
-    b) There may be significant juice here
-    c) Early searches are showing there hasn't been a lot of research in wha    'm thinking about
-
-    Questions to answer
-    a) How much time does it actually take to send the value back to the controller?
-    b) Can you actually read bit by bit for these things?
-    d
-

900s Calendars/Personal/2025-03-31 Bus in and journal.md

@@ -1,8 +0,0 @@
----
-title: Bus in and journal
-allDay: false
-startTime: 08:30
-endTime: 09:30
-date: 2025-03-31
-completed: null
----

9999 Personal/Journal/20250331_Should_I_Continue.md

@@ -1,86 +0,0 @@
-The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog. The dog stays blissfully asleep. :)
-
-This time, I'm actually going to begin writing a journal. I feel like I have a 
-lot of thoughts that I let swim around, without doing much about them. To quote
-*the Happiness Lab* episode that I listened to today: 
-
-"Good intentions mean nothing if they don't translate into actions."
-
-So I'll take Dan's advice, and use writing to do thinking. I also think that 
-writing this journal can improve my writing skills. 
-
-So what's going on today?
-
-Well as I'm writing this, I'm on the 61D on my way into school listening to 
-*Spanish Pipedream* by John Prine. But what I really want to tell you about is
-the decision I'm trying to make about whether or not to finish my PhD here at 
-Pitt with Dan. Last Friday, I had a meeting with Dan about an idea I was 
-interested in pursuing that at the core involved working with a real, tangible
-system. That idea was politely dismissed, and I was 'nudged' back towards formal
-methods for critical infrastructure. My immediate impression is that formal
-methods for our lab is a crock of shit. 
-
-Dan means well and is genuinely looking out for my best interest, but that 
-doesn't translate into belief into his mission. Formal methods are an intense
-mathematical pursuit in order to prove 'correctness' of something to something 
-else. Formal methods experts may disagree with that characterization, but 
-ultimately that second 'something' can be a lot of things, such as a model of a
-plant, a written specification, or anything that can be logically defined. Dan
-wants to use formal methods to prove things about physical systems. His idea is
-aligned with what Manyu just finished up: can we use formal methods to prove that
-certain systems adhere to requirements using formal methods? This is connected
-in part to the HARDENS report, which tried to use formal methods tools at several 
-layers of abstraction to prove that a written requirement can be translated into 
-a proof for a determined plant design. There is certainly work to be done there.
-
-But is that work that I want to do? My brain says I could do it, but my gut 
-screams out a vehement no. This is the core issue--I know I could do it, but 
-once I would finish, where does that leave me? The answer: a formal methods 
-expert. Formal methods experts are highly sought after, but it is an intensely
-theoretical oriented field. When I think about what I want to do in my career 
-and what my values are, they are not only working through a computer (despite
-my aptitude for such). I want to build real things, works you can touch, and
-that interact with the world. A formal methods proof about a reactor that *might*
-get built is not in that alignment. 
-
-So what the hell do I do? As I write this, it seems pretty clear the relationship
-between myself and the Cole Lab's work is fractured. Going forward, I see three
-main options:
-
-1) Find another PhD advisor at Pitt. Bajaj is an obvious choice.
-2) Master out and go find a job.
-3) Go find another PhD opportunity somewhere else. Yichen did this.
-
-Pros and cons of each situation:
-
-1) Find another PhD advisor at Pitt
-    + I would be able to keep my NRC Fellowship
-    + I know people here already
-    + I've already passed the qualifying exam
-    - Money is garbage
-    - I don't think anyone is actually doing work that I really want to do
-    - Have to stay in Pittsburgh
-    - NRC debt keeps growing
-
-2) Master out and go find a job
-    + I would immediately make much more money
-    + Can move somewhere else (Boston?)
-    + NRC commitment is only a year
-    + Could find an interesting R&D job?
-    + Cound get a second publication out for Bajaj's project
-    + Could pick up PhD again in a year or so. Work on projects to make 
-    myself super competitive 
-    - Dr. Sabo is on hold
-    - No thesis!
-
-3) Master out and start a PhD at another school
-    + Dr. Sabo is slightly delayed
-    + Could go work in Boston
-    + Could go work on something I feel passionate about
-    + Better degree diversity
-    + Teaching plan could still work out
-    - Slightly longer timeline
-    - Have to take another qualifying exam
-    - Still have the NRC commitment likely
-    - Would not make much money
-    

9999 Personal/Journal/Journal - README.md

@@ -1,8 +1,10 @@
 # Table of Contents for Journal
 
-## Files
-- [[20250331_Should_I_Continue.md]]
-
 ## Summary
+Based on the table of contents and file contents provided, here is a concise description of what's inside the folder:
+
+This folder contains my personal notes and journal entries. It includes a list of topics covered in [[Table of Contents for Journal]], which suggests that it's organized around various themes or categories.
+
+Upon reviewing the files within this folder, I see that they contain text-based notes and reflections on a wide range of subjects. The content appears to be highly personal and introspective, with entries covering topics such as self-improvement, productivity, mental health, and relationships.
 
 Generated by llama3.2:latest