From ff51f0a69347e25ec22343da8f93752c04732a01 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dane Sabo Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 11:14:23 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] vault backup: 2025-02-20 11:14:23 --- .../2025-02-21 - State of the Art.md | 50 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+) diff --git a/2.1 GSA Meeting Notes/QSG 2025 Sprnig/2025-02-21 - State of the Art.md b/2.1 GSA Meeting Notes/QSG 2025 Sprnig/2025-02-21 - State of the Art.md index e69de29b..2b69aee2 100644 --- a/2.1 GSA Meeting Notes/QSG 2025 Sprnig/2025-02-21 - State of the Art.md +++ b/2.1 GSA Meeting Notes/QSG 2025 Sprnig/2025-02-21 - State of the Art.md @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@ +# Presentation Outline +**I. Assertion** + +* The State of the Art section is crucial in research as it defines the domain expertise, +identifies the limits of current practice, and sets up the next section. + +**II. Evidence 1: Definition of State of the Art** + +* It's not just about listing existing work but also about understanding what others have +done, what they didn't do well, and how your research can improve upon it. +* (Source: "The State of the Art is the frenetic and relentless pursuit of doing what its +best at that time!" - Da Anunciação Marco) + +**III. Evidence 2: Importance of Clear Limitations** + +* Clearly defining the limits of current practice is essential to identify what has been done +well and what areas need improvement. +* (Source: "Clearly you hope to improve on something with your research... It is best to +clearly define the limits of current practice." - Unknown) + +**IV. Evidence 3: Focus on Relevant Tools and Techniques** + +* Focusing too much on individual researchers or their work can lead to confusion, while +highlighting the technology or method itself as the main actor is more effective. +* (Source: "Avoid focusing too much on individual researchers or their work; instead, +highlight the technology or method itself as the main actor." - Unknown) + +**V. Evidence 4: Clarity and Coherence** + +* The writing should be clear, understandable, and concise, avoiding unnecessary details or +jargon. +* (Source: "The writing should be clear, understandable, and concise... avoid unnecessary +details or jargon.") + +**VI. Evidence 5: Importance of Storytelling** + +* A coherent story or thread of ideas throughout the section is essential to effectively +communicate the state of the art. +* (Source: "Does the writer tell a coherent story? Can you follow thread of the story?" - +Unknown) + +**VII. Conclusion** + +* The State of the Art section requires careful consideration and attention to detail to +effectively communicate the current state of practice in research. + +Note: The sources listed are from the original text, but may not be directly cited as +evidence in a formal academic or professional setting. + +