From d6d561918907a2ef0701e73a3d685f6334c63636 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dane Sabo Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 09:40:11 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] vault backup: 2025-02-10 09:40:11 --- ...ata_Analysis_Reading_Chapter_2pdf2254ME.md | 48 +++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/200 Library Papers/ME2046_Sampled_Data_Analysis_Reading_Chapter_2pdf2254ME.md b/200 Library Papers/ME2046_Sampled_Data_Analysis_Reading_Chapter_2pdf2254ME.md index 40903b1e2..8f9aabc08 100644 --- a/200 Library Papers/ME2046_Sampled_Data_Analysis_Reading_Chapter_2pdf2254ME.md +++ b/200 Library Papers/ME2046_Sampled_Data_Analysis_Reading_Chapter_2pdf2254ME.md @@ -15,10 +15,10 @@ citekey: "ME2046_Sampled_Data_Analysis_Reading_Chapter_2pdf2254ME" --- # Indexing Information -## DOI -[](https://doi.org/) -## ISBN -[](https://www.isbnsearch.org/isbn/) + + + + ## Tags: @@ -35,20 +35,48 @@ citekey: "ME2046_Sampled_Data_Analysis_Reading_Chapter_2pdf2254ME" # Annotations ->[!attention] Highlight + + + + + +>[!attention] Highlight > *The result is illustrated in Figure 2.8. Note that the reconstructed signal is lagging behind the original signal. The reason is that the sampled signal did not contain values before t = 0 and only has finite terms. The interpolation formula is based on infinite series with both past and future samples available.* > + ->[!attention] Highlight + + +>[!attention] Highlight > * (  ) mod( )  1 N S N* -> > >[!note] Note > >NOTE! This uses the NYQUIST frequency. NOT the sampling frequency. +> + ->[!attention] Highlight + + +>[!attention] Highlight > *One serious problem with the ideal low-pass filter given by Eq. (2.10) is that the filter is non-causal, since h(t) is nonzero for t < 0. h(t) starts at t   while the impulse that triggers the response does not occur until t  0* > - -### Imported: 2025-02-10 9:27 am + +## Tasks + + + +- [ ] he Laplace trans + + > Note: blah blah blah blah + + + + + + + + + + +### Imported: 2025-02-10 9:37 am