danesabo/Obsidian
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Auto sync: 2025-08-19 12:50:54 (1 files changed)

Browse Source 
M  "Zettelkasten/Permanent Notes/Literature Notes/LIT-20250819112550-strix-explicit-reactive-synthesis-strikes-back.md"
This commit is contained in:
Dane Sabo 2025-08-19 12:50:54 -04:00
parent dd1bc662f4
commit be553ababb
1 changed files with 10 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

11
Zettelkasten/Permanent Notes/Literature Notes/LIT-20250819112550-strix-explicit-reactive-synthesis-strikes-back.md
View File

@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ id: LIT-20250819112550
title: Strix: Explicit Reactive Synthesis Strikes Back! title: Strix: Explicit Reactive Synthesis Strikes Back!
type: literature type: literature
created: 2025-08-19T15:25:50Z created: 2025-08-19T15:25:50Z
modified: 2025-08-19T16:48:14Z modified: 2025-08-19T16:50:53Z
citekey: meyerStrixExplicitReactive2018 citekey: meyerStrixExplicitReactive2018
--- ---
@ -35,10 +35,19 @@ Easy to read!
## Second Pass ## Second Pass
**What is the main thrust?** **What is the main thrust?**
The main thrust is their new tool, Strix.
**What is the supporting evidence?** **What is the supporting evidence?**
They make a testing suite that is supposed to be similar to
the SYNTCOMP2017 testing setup, and run their solver
through the same trials that the competition included. They
achieve pretty good results: much much faster solve times
while also keeping automata size small.
**What are the key findings?** **What are the key findings?**
Strix is pretty good. The use of DBAs seems effective. Their
'quality', a measure of automata size vs specification size,
is also pretty good compared to other synthesizers.
## Third Pass ## Third Pass
**Recreation Notes:** **Recreation Notes:**