vault backup: 2024-10-16 11:01:26

This commit is contained in:
Dane Sabo 2024-10-16 11:01:26 -04:00
parent 601bb0265f
commit a92f08d743
5 changed files with 80 additions and 925 deletions

View File

@ -140,7 +140,16 @@
"Optimization": 128,
"Parametric-statistics": 129,
"Trajectory": 130,
"Uncertainty": 131
"Uncertainty": 131,
"Benchmark-testing": 132,
"Frequency-response": 133,
"Loop-shaping": 134,
"Resonant-frequency": 135,
"robust-control": 136,
"structured-uncertainty": 137,
"Transfer-functions": 138,
"unstructured-uncertainty": 139,
"visualized-design": 140
},
"_version": 3
}

View File

@ -5,7 +5,7 @@
{
"id": 1,
"name": "My Library",
"lastUpdate": 1729088019623
"lastUpdate": 1729090755257
}
],
"renderCitations": true,

File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long

View File

@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
---
readstatus: false
dateread:
title: "Modified Bode Plots for Robust Performance in SISO Systems With Structured and Unstructured Uncertainties"
year: 2012
authors:
- "Atsumi, Takenori"
- "Messner, William C."
citekey: "atsumiModifiedBodePlots2012"
journal: "IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology"
volume: 20
issue: 2
pages: 356-368
---
# Indexing Information
## DOI
[10.1109/TCST.2011.2177978](https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2011.2177978)
## ISBN
[](https://www.isbnsearch.org/isbn/)
## Tags:
#Benchmark-testing, #Control-systems, #Frequency-response, #Loop-shaping, #Resonant-frequency, #robust-control, #Robustness, #structured-uncertainty, #Transfer-functions, #Uncertainty, #unstructured-uncertainty, #visualized-design
>[!Abstract]
>We have developed a loop-shaping methodology for robust control design in single-input single-output (SISO) systems with structured and unstructured uncertainties. This design method employs visualization tools that are modifications of the classical Bode plot. Using the proposed method control engineers can easily consider the effects of the structured and unstructured uncertainties without the need for transfer-function models of the plant, the sensitivity function performance, or the uncertainty. The method simultaneously can avoid excessive conservativeness and excessively high order controllers while improving controller performance and robustness. We show utility of the proposed method by applying it to a head-positioning control system in a hard disk drive.
>[!note] Markdown Notes
>None!
>[!seealso] Related Papers
>
# Annotations
>[!example] Secondary Source
> *A UTOMATED design tools for robust control system based on , -synthesis, and linear matrix inequalities (LMI) have been widely used to assure both stability and performance in closed-loop systems subject to plant uncertainties [1], [2]. These techniques have been particularly successful for designing robust controller for multi-input/multi-output (MIMO) systems, for which classical control theory is ill-suited.*
>
>[!done] Quote
> *The engineer cannot see the robust controller until building the generalized plant that contains all the robust control design problems.*
>
>[!done] Quote
> *The disadvantage of loop shaping is that the usual measures of robustness-gain margin and phase margin-are inadequate to account for all but the simplest uncertainties in the nominal model.*
>
### Imported: 2024-10-16 10:59 am

View File

@ -7,3 +7,7 @@ I should add some context: [[4 Qualifying Exam/3 Notes/Feedback Control Theory]]
Robust control works with
[[What is gain scheduling?]]
# What are the limits?
Not particularly a limit but something to look at: there are a ton of papers that use the word 'robust' but aren't actually doing textbook robust control as Doyle puts it. Instead, they're doing some kind of formal methods and calling it robust because...? Who knows. Here's some examples:
[[farzanRobustControlSynthesis2020]]
**Limitation**: Using automated design tools for robust control of SISO systems has its benefits outweighed by the labor involved in creating the weighting transfer functions [@atsumiModifiedBodePlots2012].