vault backup: 2024-10-14 15:01:08
This commit is contained in:
parent
691dfe93e6
commit
90ef0bf0ae
@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
|
||||
# Chapter 1:
|
||||
All info from [[doyleFeedbackControlTheory2009]]
|
||||
# Chapter 1 - Introduction
|
||||
![[Pasted image 20241012132644.png]]
|
||||
Notable signals:
|
||||
- r - reference or command input
|
||||
@ -34,7 +35,14 @@ Notable signals:
|
||||
>> $$ ||\hat G||_2 = \left(\frac{1}{2\pi} \int_{-\infty}^\infty |\hat G(j\omega)|^2d\omega \right) ^{1/2} = \left( \int_{\infty}^\infty |G(t)|^2 dt \right)^{1/2}$$
|
||||
|
||||
![[Pasted image 20241012135404.png]]
|
||||
# Chapter 3 - Basic Feedback Loop
|
||||
![[Pasted image 20241014145054.png]]
|
||||
P, C, and F are system transfer functions. For a system to be **well-posed**, they cannot all be strictly proper. P is almost always strictly proper while the others aren't.
|
||||
|
||||
Something interesting - If $\frac{1}{1+PCF}$ is proper, then this suggests that the system output goes to zero when $j\omega\rightarrow \infty$. This isn't true in reality, because real systems will behave in a not linear way at high frequencies.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
>[!tip] Nine System Transfer Functions
|
||||
>$$\left(\matrix{x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3}\right) = \frac{1}{1+PCF} \left[\matrix{1 & -PF & -F \\ C & 1 & -CF \\ PC & P & 1}\right] \left(\matrix{r \\ d \\ n}\right) $$
|
||||
>**Notable Properties**:
|
||||
>- All 9 transfer functions are strictly proper if 1+PCF is not strictly proper.
|
||||
>- If all 9 transfer functions are stable, then the system is **internally stable**
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||
# History
|
||||
## Where did Robust Control come from?
|
||||
After the beginnings of modern control and the development of optimal control, John Doyle released a paper in 1978 titled [Guaranteed Margins for LQG regulators](doyleGuaranteedMarginsLQG1978a). This is a less than one page paper that basically gave birth to the robust control field, with a three word abstract: "There are none." I'm working out the kinks in this one ([[Basic Feedback Control]]), but essentially the gaussian part of the LQG is what destroys the guaranteed part of the phase and gain margins. The additional estimator involved can really screw with things.
|
||||
After the beginnings of modern control and the development of optimal control, John Doyle released a paper in 1978 titled [Guaranteed Margins for LQG regulators](doyleGuaranteedMarginsLQG1978a). This is a less than one page paper that basically gave birth to the robust control field, with a three word abstract: "There are none." I'm working out the kinks in this one ([[Feedback Control Theory]]), but essentially the gaussian part of the LQG is what destroys the guaranteed part of the phase and gain margins. The additional estimator involved can really screw with things.
|
||||
|
||||
I should add some context: [[4 Qualifying Exam/3 Notes/Feedback Control Theory]].
|
||||
# What does Robust Control do?
|
||||
|
||||
BIN
Pasted image 20241014145054.png
Normal file
BIN
Pasted image 20241014145054.png
Normal file
Binary file not shown.
|
After Width: | Height: | Size: 69 KiB |
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user