From 8dfac8005aab5214b76399da78168da15f3d0921 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dane Sabo Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2024 08:32:48 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] vault backup: 2024-10-22 08:32:48 --- ...-10-22 Meeting with Gleeson and Committee Chairs.md | 10 ++++++++-- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/2.1 GSA Meeting Notes/2024-10-22 Meeting with Gleeson and Committee Chairs.md b/2.1 GSA Meeting Notes/2024-10-22 Meeting with Gleeson and Committee Chairs.md index 0378e584..c8b6e9d1 100644 --- a/2.1 GSA Meeting Notes/2024-10-22 Meeting with Gleeson and Committee Chairs.md +++ b/2.1 GSA Meeting Notes/2024-10-22 Meeting with Gleeson and Committee Chairs.md @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ MSE Version: In the publicly available version of the MSE PhD guidelines, there is no mention of academic integrity on the Qualifying Exam. --- -Perhaps looking at some scenarios will help us pin down what is acceptable. +One big question: - **What is "specific technical points"?** ----- @@ -34,4 +34,10 @@ Beth notices technical inaccuracies in Jon's writing. Jon is preparing for his oral examination. He would like some presentation practice, and presents to his peers in his lab. -- **What kind of questions can Jon's peers ask?** \ No newline at end of file +- **What kind of questions can Jon's peers ask?** +- **Can these peers tell Jon where he has gaps?** + +--- +Knowing your committee: + +What should the expectation be? \ No newline at end of file