vault backup: 2024-08-29 16:05:36

.obsidian/community-plugins.json

@@ -11,5 +11,6 @@
   "obsidian-admonition",
   "obsidian-git",
   "obsidian-full-calendar",
-  "highlightr-plugin"
+  "highlightr-plugin",
+  "obsidian-footnotes"
 ]

.obsidian/hotkeys.json

@@ -167,5 +167,13 @@
       ],
       "key": "-"
     }
+  ],
+  "obsidian-footnotes:insert-autonumbered-footnote": [
+    {
+      "modifiers": [
+        "Mod"
+      ],
+      "key": "0"
+    }
   ]
 }

.obsidian/plugins/obsidian-footnotes/manifest.json

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+{
+  "id": "obsidian-footnotes",
+  "name": "Footnote Shortcut",
+  "version": "0.1.3",
+  "minAppVersion": "0.12.0",
+  "description": "Insert and write footnotes faster",
+  "author": "Alexis Rondeau, Micha Brugger, Jason Qin",
+  "authorUrl": "https://publish.obsidian.md/alexisrondeau",
+  "isDesktopOnly": false
+}

4. Qualifying Exam/2. Writing/QE Abstract.md

@@ -4,10 +4,10 @@
 <mark style="background: #FFB86CA6;">Examining the robustness of a <mark style="background: #FFF3A3A6;">controller</mark> requires additional mathematical formalism of a system, and analysis of perturbations to a nominal plant model.</mark>
 <mark style="background: #FF5582A6;">Perturbations can be considered as two forms--structured and unstructured perturbation.</mark>
 <mark style="background: #ADCCFFA6;">Unstructured perturbation in particular allows the perturbation to take on any transfer function (or transfer matrix), such that the gain of the transfer function remains less than one.</mark>
-If a <mark style="background: #FFB86CA6;">controlled system</mark> remains stable for the ~~nominal plant and all possible perturbations~~ all possible perturbations within the set, it is considered robust.
-To actually validate this statement with actual perturbations is a difficult problem.
-Generating perturbations is not trivial because there is so much possibility for the form of an unstructured perturbation.
-For an engineer to accomplish this task today one of two things happens: 
+If a <mark style="background: #FFB86CA6;">controlled system</mark> remains stable for the ~~nominal plant and all possible perturbations~~ all possible perturbations within the set[^1], it is considered robust.
+To <mark style="background: #FF5582A6;">actually</mark> validate this statement with <mark style="background: #FFB86CA6;">actual</mark> perturbations is a difficult problem.
+Generating perturbations is not trivial <mark style="background: #FFB86CA6;">because there is so much possibility for the form of an unstructured perturbation.</mark>
+<mark style="background: #FFB86CA6;">For an engineer to accomplish this task today one of two things happens: </mark>
 1. An engineer can randomly generate transfer functions as a perturbation and evaluate if their gain is less than one, or 
 2. An engineer creates a structured perturbation instead using some parameters (transfer function order, physical attributes, etc.)
 
@@ -23,4 +23,6 @@ This method of perturbation generation can be very powerful for robust controlle
 
 **STATS: 407 words. 157 too many.**
 
-[[QE Abstract Take 1 Edits]]
+[[QE Abstract Take 1 Edits]]
+
+[^1]:Likely need to introduce what the fuck the set is