vault backup: 2025-06-17 10:05:34
This commit is contained in:
parent
d6f3e695f8
commit
24bdec1432
@ -1,6 +1,32 @@
|
|||||||
<!The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog. The dog takes a nice nap. :)>
|
t<!The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog. The dog takes a nice nap. :)>
|
||||||
This is a general breakdown of how the conference went, what I learned, and
|
This is a general breakdown of how the conference went, what I learned, and
|
||||||
what my impressions were.
|
what my impressions were.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Day One
|
# Day One
|
||||||
##
|
## Keynote
|
||||||
|
Darren Cofer from Collins Aerospace gave a really good talk about AI and
|
||||||
|
how we can reason about it when it comes to high assurance systems. This is
|
||||||
|
the littlebird autonomous helicopter guy in Loonwerks. Buddy knows his shit.
|
||||||
|
Big takeaways were the following:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. There's going to be demand for high assurance AI systems. We need software
|
||||||
|
that can generalize better than explicit rule based designs that we have now.
|
||||||
|
2. Approaches to high assurance AI straddle two ditches: one side being 'it's
|
||||||
|
just software' and 'it's impossible'. Neither are really true.
|
||||||
|
3. Bound behavior of probabilistic requirements seems like a good strategy
|
||||||
|
4. He started talking about AADL for run time assurance using assume
|
||||||
|
guarantee stuff
|
||||||
|
5. Idiocracy referenced
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Theorem Proving
|
||||||
|
1. What the fuck is a DAG?
|
||||||
|
- Turns out it's Directed Acyclic Graph
|
||||||
|
2. Some stuff from TLA+
|
||||||
|
3. Most of what I got is it was people building tools for problems in
|
||||||
|
software. No applications.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Verification
|
||||||
|
1. Didn't really get anything from the first two.
|
||||||
|
2.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user