diff --git a/.obsidian/plugins/colored-tags/data.json b/.obsidian/plugins/colored-tags/data.json index 61de44d65..9a57f347d 100755 --- a/.obsidian/plugins/colored-tags/data.json +++ b/.obsidian/plugins/colored-tags/data.json @@ -118,7 +118,8 @@ "Obsidian": 106, "Obsidian1": 107, "Diffusion": 108, - "Turbulence": 109 + "Turbulence": 109, + "ERLM": 110 }, "_version": 3 } \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/300s School/ME 3100 - Engineering Research and Leadership Management/1. Goals and Outcomes.md b/300s School/ME 3100 - Engineering Research and Leadership Management/1. Goals and Outcomes.md index acab1b7e1..333bea61b 100644 --- a/300s School/ME 3100 - Engineering Research and Leadership Management/1. Goals and Outcomes.md +++ b/300s School/ME 3100 - Engineering Research and Leadership Management/1. Goals and Outcomes.md @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ +#ERLM # Goals and Outcomes - +Review [[ERLM_Structure_of_Objectives_Page.pdf]] _Begin with the end in mind_ _--- Steven Covey_ @@ -14,9 +15,7 @@ _What are you trying to achieve? Explain your outcomes using absolutely no jargo The Goals and Outcomes of your proposal are your chance to set the vision for your research. It is important at the beginning of your research to make clear to the reader where you want to be at the end. The proposal is a plan for getting to that place, and everything after the Outcomes is about explaining where you start and what path you will take. An outcome is a thing aimed at or sought; it's a goal. That idea, however, creates confusion since a research goal is the broad purpose, and outcomes are specific statements about what you want to be able to achieve. For our purposes, we will distinguish between the research goal and the research outcomes, but both will be contained in the Goals and Outcomes section of the proposal. - ## Research Goal - You must write the proposal with the reviewer in mind. The reviewer will want to know from the beginning what the proposal is about, so start every proposal with "The goal of this research is to ..." @@ -30,9 +29,7 @@ This goal sets the vision for what you want to achieve; it is the circle on the It can be challenging or even unwise to stuff a big vision into just one sentence, but you don't want to have it take up a page or even half of one. Keep the research goal one to three sentences in length. If you have to go longer than that, you probably don't have a goal that is clear enough to you, which means it will not be clear to the reader, or you are trying to over define your goal, in which case some of what you are saying might be part of the outcomes or impact. While your goal begins your vision of what you want to achieve in your research, it may not be tangible or concrete. Reviewers will want and need to see a more clear picture of where your research will go. It would seem, since the point of the proposal is to explain what you want to do in your research, that next you should lay out what you would do in your research. The trouble is that, while the reviewer does care what you will do, they care more where you will end up.  Think of them as the one with the money --- they sometimes are, but often are not --- and they want to know what it is they get for their investment. What are they buying? What is the product of your effort? What will you achieve? _These questions are not about the tasks you will undertake}_, but rather about where you will be if the research is successful and what you will be able to do that is new. The answer to these questions are the research outcomes. - ## Research Outcomes - The research outcomes are brief, clear, concise statements of what you should be able to do if the research is successful. These are like mini-goals, but they are more specific. They are not necessarily steps along the way to a larger goal; rather, they are the sign posts that, if achieved, together would meet the overarching goal. The outcomes provide clarity and definition of your goal, and make clear what the specific things you want to be able to do if successful. This vision is something that you will return to throughout the proposal as you make connections between your efforts and how they will help you achieve your outcomes. Since you will be making these connections, the reader should be able to keep your vision in mind as they read, and you need to facilitate this by making each outcome sticky. Do this by making them simple, concrete, and credible. You do not need all of the traits, but do as many as you can. Well formulated outcomes should do the following: @@ -66,28 +63,18 @@ Offer comment using Acrobat's comment feature.  Address the questions below, wh A note about spelling, grammar, and typos:  Writers should make a point to eliminate these errors from what they write.  Typos, for example, distract the reader and detract from your writing.  As editors, it is not your job to ferret these mistakes out.  Focus on the message and substance of the writing, and only comment on these annoyances if you just can't stand it. _When you offer a criticism, offer a remedy so the writer can improve their work._ - ## Research Goal - The goal sets the vision for what you want to achieve; it is the circle on the map for where you want to be if the research is successful. - Is the goal a clear statement about what the research would achieve if successful?  Explain why or why not. - Explain what you think the vision for the research is.  - Is the scope of the goal of the research "just right'', not too grandiose or too narrow?  Explain how it could be made that way. - ## Research Outcomes - The research outcomes should be brief, clear, concise statements of what could be done if the research is successful.  These are like mini-goals, but they are more specific. - Are the research outcomes brief, clear, and concise statements of what should be able to be done if the research is successful?  Verify that the outcomes are not tasks or steps of the research. - Explain how the outcomes, if achieved, meet the overarching goal. - Are the research outcomes verifiable?  How so? - ## Reader's Perspective - - In your own words, describe the goals and objectives.  Do you have a clear picture of where the PI wants his research to go?  Has the writer transmitted his message to you? -- Has the PI provided sufficient explanation about the goal and objectives?  Are they over/under explained?  Explain what pieces would be helpful to clarify the picture. - -## Meet with the PI - -Meet with the person you have reviewed.  Make recommendations and comments.  Discuss ways the writing could be made more clear and the communication better. \ No newline at end of file +- Has the PI provided sufficient explanation about the goal and objectives?  Are they over/under explained?  Explain what pieces would be helpful to clarify the picture. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/300s School/ME 3100 - Engineering Research and Leadership Management/2. State of the Art and Limits of Current Practice.md b/300s School/ME 3100 - Engineering Research and Leadership Management/2. State of the Art and Limits of Current Practice.md index 3207921a7..e7c4595ed 100644 --- a/300s School/ME 3100 - Engineering Research and Leadership Management/2. State of the Art and Limits of Current Practice.md +++ b/300s School/ME 3100 - Engineering Research and Leadership Management/2. State of the Art and Limits of Current Practice.md @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ +#ERLM # State of the Art and Limits of Current Practice _State of the Art is the frenetic and relentless pursuit of doing what its best at that time! diff --git a/300s School/ME 3100 - Engineering Research and Leadership Management/3. Research Approach.md b/300s School/ME 3100 - Engineering Research and Leadership Management/3. Research Approach.md index fcdfff2d8..8ac7cca4e 100644 --- a/300s School/ME 3100 - Engineering Research and Leadership Management/3. Research Approach.md +++ b/300s School/ME 3100 - Engineering Research and Leadership Management/3. Research Approach.md @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@ +#ERLM + Write the Research Approach and Methods section. Clearly describe the methods, protocols, techniques, and tools that will be used in the research. Describe the strategy for moving from the limits identified in the previous section to the goals and objectives in the first section. Typically, this is the longest section of a proposal because you have to spend the most time developing everything you will use for the research and describe the strategy for using it. diff --git a/300s School/ME 3100 - Engineering Research and Leadership Management/4. Metrics of Success.md b/300s School/ME 3100 - Engineering Research and Leadership Management/4. Metrics of Success.md index 8974dd222..bdc9f0118 100644 --- a/300s School/ME 3100 - Engineering Research and Leadership Management/4. Metrics of Success.md +++ b/300s School/ME 3100 - Engineering Research and Leadership Management/4. Metrics of Success.md @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ +#ERLM Write the Metrics of Success section. Clearly describe how you will define success.  How much more accurate, more precise, faster, or more efficient will the technology be?  How will you demonstrate that you achieved the outcomes outlined in the Goals and Outcomes section?  Will you be advancing the TRL of the technology?  From what TRL level and how much? ## The Review Read the entire document.  When you read the paper, identify sections or paragraphs that you find challenging or confusing to read --- if you have to reread a paragraph to grasp its message, circle it.  These passages will need additional attention by the writer. diff --git a/300s School/ME 3100 - Engineering Research and Leadership Management/5. Research Impact.md b/300s School/ME 3100 - Engineering Research and Leadership Management/5. Research Impact.md index 7d559bd1a..ac5809e84 100644 --- a/300s School/ME 3100 - Engineering Research and Leadership Management/5. Research Impact.md +++ b/300s School/ME 3100 - Engineering Research and Leadership Management/5. Research Impact.md @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ +#ERLM Write the Research Impact section. Clearly describe for your research what will be the the broader impact.  Does the work offer societal benefits?  If so, be clear about what those benefits are and who they serve.  How will you advance discovery and understanding while promoting teaching and learning?  How will you address under-represented groups?  How will you reach out to under-represented groups? ## The Review The thing you are trying to determine are the questions to the Heilmeir question: