From 5634e983886ab2cc062bae9157a26af0fb6855fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dane Sabo Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 15:10:50 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 01/15] vault backup: 2024-10-16 15:10:50 --- .obsidian/plugins/obsidian-pandoc-reference-list/data.json | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/.obsidian/plugins/obsidian-pandoc-reference-list/data.json b/.obsidian/plugins/obsidian-pandoc-reference-list/data.json index e194fbed..0de5890a 100755 --- a/.obsidian/plugins/obsidian-pandoc-reference-list/data.json +++ b/.obsidian/plugins/obsidian-pandoc-reference-list/data.json @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ { "id": 1, "name": "My Library", - "lastUpdate": 1729095799246 + "lastUpdate": 1729105848319 } ], "renderCitations": true, From 377f8949e1ea7d95f7b94205b6d8be3c0cd96c87 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dane Sabo Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 15:13:22 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 02/15] vault backup: 2024-10-16 15:13:22 --- 4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md b/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md index b8cbc805..a8f44bf0 100644 --- a/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md +++ b/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ Robustness is dependent on two features: the characteristic to be guaranteed, an Suppose a plant representing a spring-mass-damper system is described as follows @controltutorialsformatlab&simulinkInvertedPendulumSystem: $$ P = \frac{X(s)}{F(s)} = \frac{1}{ms^2 + bs +k}$$ - +A structured perturbation might (The disk multiplicative perturbation) (Explain how actually getting to W_2 isn't really trivial). \ No newline at end of file From 87ea7a4bd192d0e0848aef95d6e89574a4cd8cdb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dane Sabo Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 15:29:30 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 03/15] vault backup: 2024-10-16 15:29:30 --- 4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md b/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md index a8f44bf0..89c3f1e0 100644 --- a/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md +++ b/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md @@ -22,7 +22,12 @@ Robustness is dependent on two features: the characteristic to be guaranteed, an Suppose a plant representing a spring-mass-damper system is described as follows @controltutorialsformatlab&simulinkInvertedPendulumSystem: $$ P = \frac{X(s)}{F(s)} = \frac{1}{ms^2 + bs +k}$$ -A structured perturbation might +A structured perturbation might take each of these physical parameters $m$, $b$, and $k$ and attribute a likely range or tolerance to their value: +$$ \mathcal{P} = \left\{ \frac{1}{(m+e_m)s^2 + (b+e_b)s + (k + e_k)} \right\} \text{ : } +\matrix{m_{min} \leq m+e_m \leq m_{max} \\ +b_{min} \leq b +e_b \leq b_{max} \\ +k_{min} \leq k +e_k \leq k_{max}} $$ +where $e_i$ is the difference between the nominal value of $i$, and the real value on the actual plant. (The disk multiplicative perturbation) (Explain how actually getting to W_2 isn't really trivial). \ No newline at end of file From d2a99b261103c1d4311f6403325c582dd65a2629 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dane Sabo Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 15:34:02 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 04/15] vault backup: 2024-10-16 15:34:02 --- 4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md b/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md index 89c3f1e0..5109db9e 100644 --- a/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md +++ b/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ $$ \mathcal{P} = \left\{ \frac{1}{(m+e_m)s^2 + (b+e_b)s + (k + e_k)} \right\} \t \matrix{m_{min} \leq m+e_m \leq m_{max} \\ b_{min} \leq b +e_b \leq b_{max} \\ k_{min} \leq k +e_k \leq k_{max}} $$ -where $e_i$ is the difference between the nominal value of $i$, and the real value on the actual plant. +where $e_m$ is the difference between the nominal mass and the actual as-built mass. $e_b$ and $e_k$ follow similar logic. (The disk multiplicative perturbation) (Explain how actually getting to W_2 isn't really trivial). \ No newline at end of file From 82bbff96464b767b1f878c07774d3268e82f6f0e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dane Sabo Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 15:38:10 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 05/15] vault backup: 2024-10-16 15:38:10 --- 4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md b/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md index 5109db9e..bc14d018 100644 --- a/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md +++ b/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ $$ \mathcal{P} = \left\{ \frac{1}{(m+e_m)s^2 + (b+e_b)s + (k + e_k)} \right\} \t \matrix{m_{min} \leq m+e_m \leq m_{max} \\ b_{min} \leq b +e_b \leq b_{max} \\ k_{min} \leq k +e_k \leq k_{max}} $$ -where $e_m$ is the difference between the nominal mass and the actual as-built mass. $e_b$ and $e_k$ follow similar logic. +where $e_m$ is the difference between the nominal mass and the actual as-built mass. $e_b$ and $e_k$ follow similar logic. Structured perturbations are easy to use to create perturbed plants: simply pick values for $e_m$, $e_b$, and $e_k$ that are within (The disk multiplicative perturbation) (Explain how actually getting to W_2 isn't really trivial). \ No newline at end of file From 081e3ea9cd4dcdbbd3745ecaf7ff983a2028c5dc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dane Sabo Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 15:44:13 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 06/15] vault backup: 2024-10-16 15:44:13 --- 4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md b/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md index bc14d018..d050f7e7 100644 --- a/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md +++ b/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ $$ \mathcal{P} = \left\{ \frac{1}{(m+e_m)s^2 + (b+e_b)s + (k + e_k)} \right\} \t \matrix{m_{min} \leq m+e_m \leq m_{max} \\ b_{min} \leq b +e_b \leq b_{max} \\ k_{min} \leq k +e_k \leq k_{max}} $$ -where $e_m$ is the difference between the nominal mass and the actual as-built mass. $e_b$ and $e_k$ follow similar logic. Structured perturbations are easy to use to create perturbed plants: simply pick values for $e_m$, $e_b$, and $e_k$ that are within +where $e_m$ is the difference between the nominal mass and the actual as-built mass. $e_b$ and $e_k$ follow similar logic. Structured perturbations are easy to use to create perturbed plants: simply pick values for $e_m$, $e_b$, and $e_k$ that are within the allowable bounds and plug them in to create a new, perturbed transfer function. (The disk multiplicative perturbation) (Explain how actually getting to W_2 isn't really trivial). \ No newline at end of file From 4b27fd1966f7247052f1a1735430055f8129d00b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dane Sabo Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 16:26:08 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 07/15] vault backup: 2024-10-16 16:26:08 --- 4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md b/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md index d050f7e7..42b1d227 100644 --- a/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md +++ b/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ $$ \mathcal{P} = \left\{ \frac{1}{(m+e_m)s^2 + (b+e_b)s + (k + e_k)} \right\} \t \matrix{m_{min} \leq m+e_m \leq m_{max} \\ b_{min} \leq b +e_b \leq b_{max} \\ k_{min} \leq k +e_k \leq k_{max}} $$ -where $e_m$ is the difference between the nominal mass and the actual as-built mass. $e_b$ and $e_k$ follow similar logic. Structured perturbations are easy to use to create perturbed plants: simply pick values for $e_m$, $e_b$, and $e_k$ that are within the allowable bounds and plug them in to create a new, perturbed transfer function. +where $e_m$ is the difference between the nominal mass and the actual as-built mass. $e_b$ and $e_k$ follow similar logic. Structured perturbations are easy to use to create perturbed plants: simply pick values for $e_m$, $e_b$, and $e_k$ that are within the allowable bounds and plug them in to create a new, perturbed transfer function. These (The disk multiplicative perturbation) (Explain how actually getting to W_2 isn't really trivial). \ No newline at end of file From 4a2fdde783e00ef9f1c565c1f52aa3bf86ce382b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dane Sabo Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 16:29:45 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 08/15] vault backup: 2024-10-16 16:29:45 --- 4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md b/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md index 42b1d227..dfd6c96c 100644 --- a/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md +++ b/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md @@ -27,7 +27,9 @@ $$ \mathcal{P} = \left\{ \frac{1}{(m+e_m)s^2 + (b+e_b)s + (k + e_k)} \right\} \t \matrix{m_{min} \leq m+e_m \leq m_{max} \\ b_{min} \leq b +e_b \leq b_{max} \\ k_{min} \leq k +e_k \leq k_{max}} $$ -where $e_m$ is the difference between the nominal mass and the actual as-built mass. $e_b$ and $e_k$ follow similar logic. Structured perturbations are easy to use to create perturbed plants: simply pick values for $e_m$, $e_b$, and $e_k$ that are within the allowable bounds and plug them in to create a new, perturbed transfer function. These +where $e_m$ is the difference between the nominal mass and the actual as-built mass. $e_b$ and $e_k$ follow similar logic. Structured perturbations are easy to use to create perturbed plants: simply pick values for $e_m$, $e_b$, and $e_k$ that are within the allowable bounds and plug them in to create a new, perturbed transfer function. + +Structured perturbations do suffer from a limit (The disk multiplicative perturbation) (Explain how actually getting to W_2 isn't really trivial). \ No newline at end of file From d59c97a2bb95b2f443ae7225ac78ed40755099be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dane Sabo Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 16:33:18 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 09/15] vault backup: 2024-10-16 16:33:18 --- 4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md b/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md index dfd6c96c..7e4e6050 100644 --- a/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md +++ b/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md @@ -27,7 +27,9 @@ $$ \mathcal{P} = \left\{ \frac{1}{(m+e_m)s^2 + (b+e_b)s + (k + e_k)} \right\} \t \matrix{m_{min} \leq m+e_m \leq m_{max} \\ b_{min} \leq b +e_b \leq b_{max} \\ k_{min} \leq k +e_k \leq k_{max}} $$ -where $e_m$ is the difference between the nominal mass and the actual as-built mass. $e_b$ and $e_k$ follow similar logic. Structured perturbations are easy to use to create perturbed plants: simply pick values for $e_m$, $e_b$, and $e_k$ that are within the allowable bounds and plug them in to create a new, perturbed transfer function. +where $e_m$ is the difference between the nominal mass and the actual as-built mass. $e_b$ and $e_k$ follow similar logic. Structured perturbations are easy to use to create perturbed plants: simply pick values for $e_m$, $e_b$, and $e_k$ that are within the allowable bounds and plug them in to create a new, perturbed transfer function. + +Structured perturbations allow for sampling of the set, but they do have a significant drawback. Structured perturbations severely restrict Structured perturbations do suffer from a limit (The disk multiplicative perturbation) From 1338f9f7a3a84c7982463ce1eabf5539b4defca5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dane Sabo Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 16:38:44 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 10/15] vault backup: 2024-10-16 16:38:44 --- 4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md b/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md index 7e4e6050..0c1729f6 100644 --- a/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md +++ b/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md @@ -29,8 +29,6 @@ b_{min} \leq b +e_b \leq b_{max} \\ k_{min} \leq k +e_k \leq k_{max}} $$ where $e_m$ is the difference between the nominal mass and the actual as-built mass. $e_b$ and $e_k$ follow similar logic. Structured perturbations are easy to use to create perturbed plants: simply pick values for $e_m$, $e_b$, and $e_k$ that are within the allowable bounds and plug them in to create a new, perturbed transfer function. -Structured perturbations allow for sampling of the set, but they do have a significant drawback. Structured perturbations severely restrict - Structured perturbations do suffer from a limit (The disk multiplicative perturbation) From 9d25816f4b5e5a6a3a00cbc37e2208be8659f63a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dane Sabo Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 16:47:45 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 11/15] vault backup: 2024-10-16 16:47:45 --- 4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md b/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md index 0c1729f6..0f1cc1e9 100644 --- a/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md +++ b/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md @@ -29,7 +29,10 @@ b_{min} \leq b +e_b \leq b_{max} \\ k_{min} \leq k +e_k \leq k_{max}} $$ where $e_m$ is the difference between the nominal mass and the actual as-built mass. $e_b$ and $e_k$ follow similar logic. Structured perturbations are easy to use to create perturbed plants: simply pick values for $e_m$, $e_b$, and $e_k$ that are within the allowable bounds and plug them in to create a new, perturbed transfer function. -Structured perturbations do suffer from a limit +**Limitation:** *Structured perturbations limit the form of perturbation possible to sample.* Because structured perturbations either are chosen a priori or through a parametric study, the form of possible perturbed plants is limited. Structured perturbations do not allow for unmodelled dynamics to be included as a possible perturbation. + +The other type of uncertainty considered is unstructured uncertainty. This type of uncertainty does not assume a form + (The disk multiplicative perturbation) (Explain how actually getting to W_2 isn't really trivial). \ No newline at end of file From cddd7df19d7a739625aa30460e1ea5be602ab8a8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dane Sabo Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 16:51:08 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 12/15] vault backup: 2024-10-16 16:51:08 --- 4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md b/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md index 0f1cc1e9..40718a7d 100644 --- a/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md +++ b/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ where $e_m$ is the difference between the nominal mass and the actual as-built m **Limitation:** *Structured perturbations limit the form of perturbation possible to sample.* Because structured perturbations either are chosen a priori or through a parametric study, the form of possible perturbed plants is limited. Structured perturbations do not allow for unmodelled dynamics to be included as a possible perturbation. -The other type of uncertainty considered is unstructured uncertainty. This type of uncertainty does not assume a form +The other type of uncertainty considered is unstructured uncertainty. This type of uncertainty does not assume a form and thus is able to capture unmodelled behavior in its robustness analysis. (The disk multiplicative perturbation) From 516dcc525407ed55e423d6805e225c550f782107 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dane Sabo Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 17:31:08 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 13/15] vault backup: 2024-10-16 17:31:08 --- 4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md b/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md index 40718a7d..5039aff4 100644 --- a/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md +++ b/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ where $e_m$ is the difference between the nominal mass and the actual as-built m **Limitation:** *Structured perturbations limit the form of perturbation possible to sample.* Because structured perturbations either are chosen a priori or through a parametric study, the form of possible perturbed plants is limited. Structured perturbations do not allow for unmodelled dynamics to be included as a possible perturbation. -The other type of uncertainty considered is unstructured uncertainty. This type of uncertainty does not assume a form and thus is able to capture unmodelled behavior in its robustness analysis. +The other type of uncertainty considered is unstructured uncertainty. This type of uncertainty does not assume a form and thus is able to capture unmodelled behavior in its robustness analysis. Unstructured sets are advantageous compared to structured sets for this reason. Robustness with respect (The disk multiplicative perturbation) From cfee2d0785da6071fe6ab28e4fd825c6e1a6f9ff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dane Sabo Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 17:40:13 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 14/15] vault backup: 2024-10-16 17:40:13 --- 4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md b/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md index 5039aff4..396a2115 100644 --- a/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md +++ b/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/2. QE State of the Art.md @@ -29,9 +29,11 @@ b_{min} \leq b +e_b \leq b_{max} \\ k_{min} \leq k +e_k \leq k_{max}} $$ where $e_m$ is the difference between the nominal mass and the actual as-built mass. $e_b$ and $e_k$ follow similar logic. Structured perturbations are easy to use to create perturbed plants: simply pick values for $e_m$, $e_b$, and $e_k$ that are within the allowable bounds and plug them in to create a new, perturbed transfer function. + Structured perturbations also require a lot of leg work to create + **Limitation:** *Structured perturbations limit the form of perturbation possible to sample.* Because structured perturbations either are chosen a priori or through a parametric study, the form of possible perturbed plants is limited. Structured perturbations do not allow for unmodelled dynamics to be included as a possible perturbation. -The other type of uncertainty considered is unstructured uncertainty. This type of uncertainty does not assume a form and thus is able to capture unmodelled behavior in its robustness analysis. Unstructured sets are advantageous compared to structured sets for this reason. Robustness with respect +The other type of uncertainty considered is unstructured uncertainty. This type of uncertainty does not assume a form and thus is able to capture unmodelled behavior in its robustness analysis. Unstructured sets are advantageous compared to structured sets for this reason. Robustness with respect to unstructured sets provides a guarantee of resilience to adverse conditions that are unanticipated, or difficult to model. (The disk multiplicative perturbation) From 1f50ffe614c43ac6d6f9ab8a622dbc7dccde6cd5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dane Sabo Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 18:01:45 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 15/15] vault backup: 2024-10-16 18:01:45 --- .../1 Managing Stuff/0. QE To Do List.md | 10 ++++++++-- .../2 Writing/3. QE Research Approach.md | 16 ++++++++++++++-- 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/4 Qualifying Exam/1 Managing Stuff/0. QE To Do List.md b/4 Qualifying Exam/1 Managing Stuff/0. QE To Do List.md index 13b4ae14..f504d663 100644 --- a/4 Qualifying Exam/1 Managing Stuff/0. QE To Do List.md +++ b/4 Qualifying Exam/1 Managing Stuff/0. QE To Do List.md @@ -1,8 +1,14 @@ - [x] Read email from Dr. Cho with shared documents 📅 2024-09-25 ⏳ 2024-09-25 [completion:: 2024-10-16] - [x] Find papers on verifying robustness⏳ 2024-10-15 📅 2024-10-16 [completion:: 2024-10-15] - [ ] Start writing about diffusion model📅 2024-10-15 -- [ ] Write about how to generate unstructured perturbations📅 2024-10-15 - + - [ ] What is the generative diffusion model? How does it work? + - [ ] How can we use this to generate new plants? + - [ ] How are we going to tell if they're in the unstrucutred perturbation disk? +- [ ] Create a one dimensional diffusion generative model 📅 2024-10-22 ⏳ 2024-10-17 +- [/] Write about how to generate unstructured perturbations📅 2024-10-15 + - [/] What is disk uncertainty? [completion:: 2024-10-16] + - [ ] Why is this something difficult to sample? +- [x] Write about how to generate structured perturbations 📅 2024-10-17 ✅ 2024-10-16 # Milestones - [x] Goals and Outcomes Finished 🆔 kwyu6a ⏳ 2024-10-02 📅 2024-10-04 ✅ 2024-10-02 - [*] State of the Art Finished 🆔 i9ybdy ⏳ 2024-10-09 📅 2024-10-11 diff --git a/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/3. QE Research Approach.md b/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/3. QE Research Approach.md index 23903d86..f5dec14b 100644 --- a/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/3. QE Research Approach.md +++ b/4 Qualifying Exam/2 Writing/3. QE Research Approach.md @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ title: Research Approach allDay: true date: 2024-10-10 -completed: null +completed: type: single endDate: 2024-10-22 --- @@ -17,4 +17,16 @@ endDate: 2024-10-22 5. How can we know if these new plants are in the set of 'controllable' plants? 6. How are we going to get training data? -Something to justify, why diffusion model as opposed to other generative AI \ No newline at end of file +Something to justify, why diffusion model as opposed to other generative AI + +# First Draft +## Topic Point +### Intro +**Paragraph 1 - Introduction** +*Topic:* Generating unstructured perturbations is a difficult problem right now, but is necessary to blah blah blah +*Point:* This research will use a diffusion generative model to create unstructured perturbations. +*Discussion*: Talk about the big pictures of what the next sections are +### The Generative Diffusion Model +### Using Diffusion to Create New Plants +### Establishing New Plants are in the Disk +### Preliminary Results \ No newline at end of file