% Demonstration
\begin{frame}{Demonstration: SmAHTR autonomous startup provides a rigorous test case}

  \begin{center}
    \begin{tikzpicture}
      \draw[thick, fill=gray!20] (0,0) rectangle (12,7);
      \node[align=center, text width=10cm] at (6,3.5) {
        \textbf{FIGURE: SmAHTR Hardware-in-Loop Setup}\\[0.3cm]
        Top: SmAHTR reactor diagram\\
        (liquid-salt cooled, representative SMR)\\[0.3cm]
        Middle: Hardware-in-loop architecture\\
        Simulink Model $\leftrightarrow$ ARCADE $\leftrightarrow$ Emerson Ovation\\[0.3cm]
        Bottom: Startup sequence state machine\\
        Cold $\rightarrow$ Heat $\rightarrow$ Criticality $\rightarrow$ Low Power $\rightarrow$ Full Power\\
        Show continuous trajectories within each state
      };
    \end{tikzpicture}
  \end{center}

  %SPEAKER NOTES: See comments below
%
    \textbf{Small Modular Advanced High Temperature Reactor (SmAHTR):}
    - Liquid-salt cooled reactor design
    - Well-documented startup procedures
    - Representative of next-generation SMR designs

    \textbf{Startup Sequence:} Cold → Controlled Heating → Approach Criticality → Low-Power Physics → Full Power
    Each mode has different control objective (temp control, ramp rate, reactivity, neutron flux, load following)

    \textbf{Implementation Platform:}
    - Simulation: High-fidelity Simulink model (thermal-hydraulics + neutron kinetics)
    - Hardware: Emerson Ovation control system (industry standard)
    - Integration: ARCADE platform (hardware-in-the-loop)
    - Validation: Real-time performance on actual control equipment

    \textbf{Why This Matters:}
    Multiple coordinated subsystems, strict timing/temperature constraints, complex nonlinear dynamics.
    This is not a toy problem---it's representative of deployment challenges.
% (End of speaker notes)
\end{frame}
