\documentclass{dane_proposal_format}

\begin{document}

\maketitle
\section{Goals and Outcomes}

The goal of this research is to use formal methods to create control systems
that can switch between operating modes with a high assurance of correct
construction. Modern control systems today often exist as hybrid control
systems. Hybrid systems are those that have both continuous and discrete
dynamics. Because of this, hybrid systems cannot be fully analyzed using only
tools from continuous or discrete methods. Today, hybrid control systems are
unable to be completely verified, that is to say we do not currently have ways
of being building hybrid control systems that we can be certain meet high level
strategic objectives, or who's behavior is totally understood.

The ambiguity on hybrid system behavior is problematic when one of the most
useful cases of hybrid system control is for improved autonomy of critical
systems. Nuclear power is a salient example. For a nuclear reactor during
start-up, every mode of power from initially cold-start, to controlled core
heating, and eventually  full operating power is well understood dynamically.
For each of these modes, significant portions of the control are optimized using
automated controllers for each stage. The problem that remains for human
operators is choosing when to switch from control law to the next, and ensuring
that the proper conditions are met to do so--but these conditions are also
clearly defined in regulation and operating procedures a priori.

We can use the fact that these transition points are well understood in
combination with formal methods to synthesize the discrete part of a hybrid
system. From that point, we can have a robust chain of proof that our discrete
jumps will happen only at the correct times. Once that is established, we can
use reachability analysis and traditional control theory to ensure that each
operation 'mode' satisfies liveness, stability, or performance requirements.
With the combination of these two methods, we can be sure of correct behavior
switching between modes, and that strategic goals remain met while transitioning
from one mode switch to the next.

If this research is successful, we will be able to do the following:

\begin{enumerate}

  \item
    \textbf{Formalize} mode switching requirements as logical statements that
    can then be translated into a controller implementation. This piece will
    address the correct-by-construction generation of the mode switching
    controller.

  \item 
    \textbf{Categorize} different continuous modes by their strategic relevance.
    Certain modes exist as control laws from one mode to the next, such as a
    controlled heating rate on reactor start-up before reaching operational
    conditions. Other modes exist as stable regions, such as full-power
    operation. 

  \item
    \textbf{Verify} continuous modes and accompanying continuous control laws
    satisfy strategic requirements. This can be done with reachability analysis,
    and ensuring that each mode transition as allowed from the requirements
    synthesis squares up against the reachability analysis and the continuous
    dynamics.

  \item
    \textbf{Prove} that a given hybrid system achieves strategic goals across
    hybrid control modes. By seperately formalizing and analyzing continuous
    dyanmics and discrete dynamics, we can come back to say the whole hybrid
    system has met a strong guarantee of requirement adherence.

\end{enumerate}

\bibliography{references}

\end{document}

