From c6490ee2754a4c35ef78254926fa794e3cd4b028 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dane Sabo Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 11:36:46 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 1/3] vault backup: 2025-07-22 11:36:46 --- ...A systematic review and research agenda.md | 24 +++++++++++++++++++ ... Assurance Using Reinforcement Learning.md | 14 +++++++---- 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) create mode 100644 Notes on Papers/Economics and finance of Small Modular Reactors- A systematic review and research agenda.md diff --git a/Notes on Papers/Economics and finance of Small Modular Reactors- A systematic review and research agenda.md b/Notes on Papers/Economics and finance of Small Modular Reactors- A systematic review and research agenda.md new file mode 100644 index 000000000..79e086b2a --- /dev/null +++ b/Notes on Papers/Economics and finance of Small Modular Reactors- A systematic review and research agenda.md @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ +# First Pass +**Category:** +Soapbox kinda paper. + +**Context:** +Robert Woods is a professor at the University of Tennessee who previously was +a senior researcher at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. +**Correctness:** +**Contributions:** +**Clarity:** + +# Second Pass +**What is the main thrust?** + +**What is the supporting evidence?** + +**What are the key findings?** + +# Third Pass +**Recreation Notes:** + +**Hidden Findings:** + +**Weak Points? Strong Points?** diff --git a/Notes on Papers/Runtime Safety Assurance Using Reinforcement Learning.md b/Notes on Papers/Runtime Safety Assurance Using Reinforcement Learning.md index fa2a4edef..a387a0336 100644 --- a/Notes on Papers/Runtime Safety Assurance Using Reinforcement Learning.md +++ b/Notes on Papers/Runtime Safety Assurance Using Reinforcement Learning.md @@ -9,19 +9,23 @@ Drones **Correctness:** Not very. They do really well in the intro and methodology, but shit hits the fan -when it comes to the results. +when it comes to the results. They don't explain things well, and also don't +really establish why their learned boundary between nominal and recovery +controllers should be successful. **Contributions:** The biggest contributions these guys make is demonstrating feasibility of their +reinforcement learned switching from the recovery controller and the nominal +controller. **Clarity:** +Well written until the whole thing came apart at the end. # Second Pass -**What is the main thrust?** +I read this a second time but I don't think it's worth it. -**What is the supporting evidence?** - -**What are the key findings?** +Their main contribution is trying to use RL to learn when to switch to a +recovery controller. # Third Pass **Recreation Notes:** From f7e7b9f5e6a5107a2dda39ed277be3b4309f5e04 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dane Sabo Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 11:48:54 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 2/3] vault backup: 2025-07-22 11:48:53 --- ...actors- A systematic review and research agenda.md | 11 ++++++++--- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/Notes on Papers/Economics and finance of Small Modular Reactors- A systematic review and research agenda.md b/Notes on Papers/Economics and finance of Small Modular Reactors- A systematic review and research agenda.md index 79e086b2a..22872ba45 100644 --- a/Notes on Papers/Economics and finance of Small Modular Reactors- A systematic review and research agenda.md +++ b/Notes on Papers/Economics and finance of Small Modular Reactors- A systematic review and research agenda.md @@ -1,12 +1,17 @@ # First Pass **Category:** -Soapbox kinda paper. +Systematic Review **Context:** -Robert Woods is a professor at the University of Tennessee who previously was -a senior researcher at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. +This paper is from the civil engineering school at the University of Leeds. +They are doing an overview of economics and finance research of small +modular reactors. + **Correctness:** + + **Contributions:** + **Clarity:** # Second Pass From 2939f0e7111fb54bce5a6cac13c12c9dbd435189 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dane Sabo Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2025 11:56:40 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 3/3] vault backup: 2025-07-22 11:56:40 --- ...ular Reactors- A systematic review and research agenda.md | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Notes on Papers/Economics and finance of Small Modular Reactors- A systematic review and research agenda.md b/Notes on Papers/Economics and finance of Small Modular Reactors- A systematic review and research agenda.md index 22872ba45..4cc905c04 100644 --- a/Notes on Papers/Economics and finance of Small Modular Reactors- A systematic review and research agenda.md +++ b/Notes on Papers/Economics and finance of Small Modular Reactors- A systematic review and research agenda.md @@ -8,11 +8,14 @@ They are doing an overview of economics and finance research of small modular reactors. **Correctness:** - +Can not say. Is a review! **Contributions:** +They do a good break down of the research we have done ('what we know') and +what needs done ('what we do not know'). They point out a big discrepancy that we do not have a lot of research on operations and maintenance costs. **Clarity:** +Nicely written. Easy to understand. # Second Pass **What is the main thrust?**