diff --git a/Notes on Papers/Economics and finance of Small Modular Reactors- A systematic review and research agenda.md b/Notes on Papers/Economics and finance of Small Modular Reactors- A systematic review and research agenda.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..4cc905c04
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Notes on Papers/Economics and finance of Small Modular Reactors- A systematic review and research agenda.md	
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+# First Pass
+**Category:** 
+Systematic Review
+
+**Context:** 
+This paper is from the civil engineering school at the University of Leeds. 
+They are doing an overview of economics and finance research of small
+modular reactors.
+
+**Correctness:** 
+Can not say. Is a review!
+
+**Contributions:** 
+They do a good break down of the research we have done ('what we know') and
+what needs done ('what we do not know'). They point out a big discrepancy that we do not have a lot of research on operations and maintenance costs. 
+
+**Clarity:** 
+Nicely written. Easy to understand.
+
+# Second Pass
+**What is the main thrust?**
+
+**What is the supporting evidence?**
+
+**What are the key findings?**
+
+# Third Pass
+**Recreation Notes:**
+
+**Hidden Findings:**
+
+**Weak Points? Strong Points?**
diff --git a/Notes on Papers/Runtime Safety Assurance Using Reinforcement Learning.md b/Notes on Papers/Runtime Safety Assurance Using Reinforcement Learning.md
index fa2a4edef..a387a0336 100644
--- a/Notes on Papers/Runtime Safety Assurance Using Reinforcement Learning.md	
+++ b/Notes on Papers/Runtime Safety Assurance Using Reinforcement Learning.md	
@@ -9,19 +9,23 @@ Drones
 
 **Correctness:** 
 Not very. They do really well in the intro and methodology, but shit hits the fan
-when it comes to the results.
+when it comes to the results. They don't explain things well, and also don't 
+really establish why their learned boundary between nominal and recovery
+controllers should be successful.
 
 **Contributions:** 
 The biggest contributions these guys make is demonstrating feasibility of their 
+reinforcement learned switching from the recovery controller and the nominal 
+controller.
 
 **Clarity:** 
+Well written until the whole thing came apart at the end.
 
 # Second Pass
-**What is the main thrust?**
+I read this a second time but I don't think it's worth it.
 
-**What is the supporting evidence?**
-
-**What are the key findings?**
+Their main contribution is trying to use RL to learn when to switch to a 
+recovery controller. 
 
 # Third Pass
 **Recreation Notes:**